>>325026
>I would bet 100 percent on this.
it is likely
>A harsh ecology is the answer
it isn't tho, not for humans, as we will use our intelligence to make ecology easy every time, it is just a logical outcome of our type emotionally driven intelligence, you need to have a culture where the normal method of reproduction is parents picking the traits of their offspring, and an embryo from their genetic material being in design in a lab and implanted into the mother, removing the regression to the mean, and thus the dysgenic selection of the easy yet predictable ecology.
>It is a self-solving problem
nope, it is a wasteful self perpetuating problem. the ecology collapsing into a harsh state doesn't get an organism that'll have adapted behaviors when under dysgenics, it nature salvaging what it can, not solving a problem
this problem is anathema to nature if nature could have such views.