>>263533 (OP)
If you mean the "make things worse on purpose, so you can rebuild after The Collapse (tm)" type of accelerationism, then it's retarded. When you make things worse, they just get worse. There's no point where the people suddenly revolt en masse against bad conditions, they just adjust to the lower quality of life and keep on doing whatever they were doing (see: South African libtards). In the west, in particular, acceleration of civilizational decline is just going to result in accelerated mass migration, and if whites end up being outnumbered it only makes it harder to right the ship. If wide-scale admixture takes place, then everything's over. There's no "rebuilding in the rubble" after that, your people don't even exist anymore (see: Mexico et al.) What you need is not a true collapse of society but a sort of "sovereign default" or fast coup, where one ruling elite is hotswapped for a better one very quickly. The more decay sets in, the harder this actually gets; better to do it sooner rather than wait for things to get worse.
If you mean the pic-related type of accelerationism, then I'd say that Providence doesn't really have to care what you or I think of it :^). Personally, I can't say I'm interested in decelerating, though. Hit the gas.