>>27638
>I won, you are refuted tee hee hee
Delusions are a sign of schizophrenia or demonic influence; you might want to get that checked out. And yes, I read what you wrote, but it doesn't address the central crux of the argument. Since you refuse to address that central point constantly aside from the very beginning where you made a short quip about how schism was lamentable and comes from pride then we can say the Reformation unleashed a lot of pride which is a sin, so I will assume you know that I and the other anon are correct and that Luther was an unintentional agent of satan because only satan would benefit from continued confusion, division, and heresy, which is a direct result of reliance on Sola Scriptura. Protestant critique of the Church through the use of scripture means very little because its exegesis is hindered by its eisegesis, which is divorced from the spiritual disposition of the Church, as lived and expressed through the Church’s tradition, worship, and theology. Again, you are like a fan club arguing against the author about what the author's book is supposed to mean. If it is your pride that is keeping you from seeing this, I can completely understand, as many Protestants see things similarly to you. At this point, all we can do is agree to disagree since this has become completely unproductive.