>>11500
>>11501
It's been a few days, but some things are becoming clear. The shooter is yet another spoiled rich kid Antifa queer whose parents sweated blood to send him to college, who never missed a meal or knew a moment's hardship in his life before his Antifa butt-buddies convinced him to get "down fo de struggle." The spoiled brat special snowflake melted down and committed murder.
>trans ideology
He's a faggot with a taste for AIDS-dripping troon cocks. Rumors are beginning to show up that he had a taste for prepubescent boys and was a member of several "catboy" Discord groomer groups, too. And if you didn't see this coming from the moment you heard the word "Antifa" then I don't know what to tell you.
>>11504
See, you just described your run-of-the-mill radicalized Leftist shooter.
Shitlibs love to throw around words like "Nazi" and "fascist," which they have used so enthusiastically and so widely for the past 80+ years that they've made them meaningless curse words. All they have meant for the last few generations is "I don't like that."
What has changed, and I hold that the inflection point was the moment in November of 2008 that it was announced that the Kenyan "won" the risible 2008 "elections," is that all these degenerates, creeps, and weirdos, all these faggots, Cluster B cases, and spiteful mutants, they started taking off those uncomfortable masks and started saying the quiet part out loud. And they started radicalizing one another in the dark corners of the Internet, saying other things that previously they were afraid to, because they thought a nigger in the White House meant they had already won and it was time to take revenge on everyone who made fun of them in high school. And in these little echo chambers they kept escalating the rhetoric, trying to one-up each other, yaslighting one another into pushing everything further, getting crazier and crazier. This is the soil in which it was nurtured and grew stronger.
But, see, at the same time, these impulses, these evil, batshit insane political positions, aren't new in Western Civilization either. The Kenyan's political mentor was a Weather Underground terrorist named Bill Ayres. In 1971 he and some of his shitlib friends wrote a book called "Prairie Fire: the Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism," in which they justified their campaigns of mail-bombs and murder, and masturbated furiously to the idea that Russia was about to carry out a nuclear decapitation strike against the US. And in the aftermath of this conveniently almost bloodless nuclear war, they were absolutely certain that the Russians were going to set them up as the overlords of their new North American colonies, and they were going to get on with the business of "liquidating" the "hard-core fascists" who could not be brought around to the Revolution and its new ways of thinking. The Russians were going to help them build gulags in Arizona and Alaska in which they were going to kill off at least 10% of the US's population at the time, twenty-five million people or more. They did all of this without any sense of irony. They were deadly serious and they're still unrepentant, because the "fascist" society they wanted to overthrow has yet, 50+ years on, not gotten around to giving each of them a bullet in the head and a shallow unmarked roadside grave, as actual totalitarian states tend to do with people who become noticeable irritants to those in power.
I'm getting to a point, I promise. See, I believe that since 2008 there was a little change in terminology on the Left, in the US and elsewhere. It went unnoticed and I think that on a thousand "queer revolution" Tumblr pages, in a thousand shitlib IRC channels and AOL chatrooms, the shitlibs gaslit one another into deciding that they were at war. And "nazi" took on an additional meaning, bit by bit. It still means "I don't like that guy." But now it also means "I have a moral blank check to do whatever I want to that guy."
These people are fucking nuts. They are batshit. I don't know how numerous they really are. At least some of the people engaging in bloodthirsty gloating on Tik Tok are surely opportunists. Some are just trolling. Some are not even political and they're rage-baiting for engagement clicks and Youtube ad money, and yes, Youtube is absolutely cool with calls for murder, so long as it's the right people saying it and the right people they want to kill, didn't you know? And a lot of them are just saying these things because they think that it'll help them fit in.
I am, though, struck by how widespread it is, even if, as I suspect, most of it is phony. I am perplexed that all these people are willing to put their actual names and grotesque fat nose-ring'd faces on the Internet saying this shit. They feel absolutely safe. They are certain there will be no consequences.
I am also seeing more and more of what looks like an organized, if poorly organized, gaslighting operation. Go to, for example, your favorite social media site and, if you have a strong stomach, pull up comment threads about the murder. Most of the shitlibs are still gloating and posting their own hitlists, calling for more killing. But more and more of them are pushing a bizarre meme that is trivially proven to be counterfactual: the shooter was a "groyper" who killed Charlie Kirk on orders from Nick Fuentes. Never mind the chat logs that are already being released, never mind that the shooter felt strongly enough about this to get a nine-dollar Harbor Freight electric pencil and carve Antifa slogans into the cartridge cases. It is, by the way, a pity that, once the case was weakened by the grooves and gouges he made in its surface, the case didn't rupture in the chamber at the weak point and give him a face full of white-hot brass shrapnel. But, yeah. "this was just another fashy killing another fashy! cope fashies cope! lolololololol" is being copied and pasted, in minor variations, about six million times an hour right now by shrill pink-haired faggots in Youtube comments.
I am surprised, but in a good way, for some values of good, to see that some people I'd thought of as being pretty hardcore and pretty radical on the fringes of the far Left have set their faces resolutely against political violence. Gavin Newsom, for one, surprised me by denouncing the murder, though the cynic in me thinks that he's just another tankie, just a tankie in an expensive suit, and his moral outrage is mostly performative. I think he is probably thinking more "oh fuck, there went the midterms," and not "one of my supporters bought what I'm selling and murdered a man in front of his kids." Cenk Uygur has also surprised me by denouncing the murder and condemning political violence. This is going to cost him followers, ratings, and money. It may even expose him to physical danger--rule one of Leftist ideology is that the machine always, always, ALWAYS needs more human flesh to feed it. This morning's heroic Party Vanguard member, standing triumphantly atop a mountain of corpses and posing for the cameras, is very frequently this afternoon's "counterrevolutionary wrecker" being handed a pickaxe and told to dig a hole by the side of the road. I would actually have a little more respect for him if I thought he understood this, but, see, if he understood enough history to know how this always goes, he wouldn't be a shitlib in the first place.
I didn't follow Charlie Kirk myself. I had heard of him, vaguely, as some earnest-looking Christian Zionist type who did a bit where he went to college campuses and debated pink-haired weirdos and made them look even more evil, stupid, and grotesque than they already were. Most of his positions seem to have been the most non-controversial, Casper Milquetoast, civnat Boomercon paint-by-numbers stuff that shouldn't have been offensive to anyone capable of eating solid food. Looking into him a bit further I see that his idolatrous worship of Israel went further than I thought it did, and that he had a lot of pants-on-head retarded opinions about US foreign policy. For civilized men in civilized places these are matters of polite disagreement and debate. But that's not where we are here and now, is it?