>>290497
>most original xbox games weren't on the 360
Enough of them were.
>xbox live absolutely fucking sucks
It actually worked for me even when I was on a shitty dial-up system on a tiny CRT.
Nintendo and Sony's online services were dogwater, and Nintendo's still is these days despite being paid. The amount of disconnects I've had playing Smash Bros on Switch is a fucking atrocity, and I get punished by them for the privilege of it. Same shit for the 3DS.
>the number of Japanese titles on the PS3 is far more numerous
No shit, it was literally a Japanese company's console with a strong established presence there, but the 360 had far more Japanese games than it ever had a right to given it's massive inherent disadvantage in their market. There were plenty of Japanese multiplats I could've listed like Vanquish, MGR, Arcana Hearts, Blazblue, Dark Souls, etc.
Exclusivity is nice when it happens (it rarely lasts though) but getting the games in the first place is what matters.
>EDF 7th gen was released on both same day
So? If you wanted to play it multiplayer, which is more likely to happen? Not to mention 2017 was on the 360 first.
<began in arcades
Bravo anon, you really showed me, I'd be in real trouble if I said that all those games began on the 360. You just put words in my mouth.
Either way, their first console being the 360 was quite significant regardless, unless you somehow think there's no difference between arcades and consoles, but I don't expect much from someone trying to pull an ACKTUALLY type own on me.
>nobody remembers blue dragon and lost odyssey
Wew.
>the anime is what carried it's popularity
Anon, I think you might have a terminal case of brain worms. Steins;Gate literally wouldn't have existed to be adapted in the first place if it wasn't for the 360, but more importantly, who gives a shit about the anime adaptation's popularity? The VN was far superior and is considered one of the greatest VNs of all time. I played it on Vita, my favorite gaming device by far, but I acknowledge that my preferred version wouldn't have existed without the 360.
>A very subjective statement.
Not really. You basically admit as much with your next statement, but handwave it off because PC existed at the time.
>Which isn't saying much due to console limitations.
Is this some kind of joke? They were almost entirely different ecosystems with many games not being ported until the 2010s, not to mention that gaming PCs in the 2000s were pretty shitty and extremely overpriced.
>the 360 has the most overrated library of games
That's your opinion, and considering the lengths you'll go to shit on the thing it doesn't have much credibility in my eyes. I had plenty of enjoyable and unique experiences on the thing and I look back on it with fondness.
>No it wasn't. The Xbox 360 Core/Arcade launched at $299.99 (2005), while the Wii was $249.99 (2006). Even after 2007 price cuts (Arcade to $279.99), it wasn't cheaper than the Wii at launch.
Did you just read this off some AI summary?
It was literally $199 after the price cuts.
https://archive.is/wu9g0