>>9367
It is logical that there would be a strong liberal form of White Nationalism but I think it reeks off of too much libertarianism, an overall fuzzy grouping of ideas that more or less advocate for moving back a few steps, said steps measured in half centuries. The liberalism itself implies a certain amount of weakness.
Usually, a free White America from the 19th then put on better rails. Americans have a cultural aversion to statism. But we can also easily forget that an excess of control and law is not only not necessary but also poisonous and the traits of tyranny. We are so badly educated about Italian Fascism that we fail to properly understand how it was organized and what it required from people, organizations and companies. Usually we tend to assume the worst, that it was overbearing when in truth it was rather weak as for one thing, it failed to purge all the traitors because it believed quite naively that the sanctimonious purity of its superior ideals would convert everyone to its cause, even its staunchest enemies.
The comparison to communism on the other hand is really a stretch and perhaps one should not forget whence Mussolini himself came. As for the NSDAP sometimes, if you didn't pay attention and ran with half truths, it superficially seemed so close to communism that trolling journalists wouldn't hesitate to pester Goebbels about it. But as I said, it was superficial and argued in bad faith by the opposition. Therefore, I'm failing to understand why you try to make that kind of comparison.
You say this board is not one of White Nationalism but I disagree, it's been that way for a long time now and I think Orlog himself put it that way. We use would we find in a fascism that is not oriented towards the protection of our people? Of the nation as a people, the White people?
I have also listened to Zeiger's speech and I agree, White Nationalism as is for now seems to have been coopted to put us in a similar feminine mindset of constantly a victimhood status, so we're all engaged in the same race with Jews, with blacks, with feminists, with homosexuals, with transsexuals, etc. Even Christians try from time to time to prop up the martyrdom narrative. While it is useful to an extent to remind our people that we too are under constant assault and we are not allowed to even discuss it or complain about it, it should not lead us to seek recognition from the system as another oppressed group. If only for the fact that we will never get the full extent of that status anyway. A fight against racism, no matter the colour nor whence it comes, is of no use to us. It is in fact a good thing that non-Whites are racist. It's only only healthy but it helps us in maintaining a separation but us and them. We would be in a far worst situation if they wanted to merge with us with abandon. Now Zeiger talks about Stromfront. This website is but a shadow of itself. VNN is the place that we should talk about if we think of a forum. Linder pretty much agrees that action, thus violence, is the way. And as he said himself, the only way is through the Jew.
Now let me quote David E. Lane.
>37th Precept
>That race whose males will not fight to death to keep and mate with their females will perish. Any White man with healthy instincts feels disgust and revulsion when he sees a woman of his race with a man of another race. Those, who today control the media and affairs of the Western World, teach that this is wrong and shameful. They label it “racism.” As any “ism,” for instance the word “nationalism,” means to promote one’s own nation; “racism” merely means to promote and protect the life of one’s own race. It is, perhaps, the proudest word in existence. Any man who disobey these instincts is anti-Nature.
>The second-guessers feel they are qualified to criticize Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. They should be aware that the leaders of the Reich were prisoners of geographical nationalism. Germany had been raped by the Versailles Treaty; anti-Polish and anti- French feelings were unavoidable. The two-front war was, also, unavoidable, since the Soviets were amassing millions of troops for a sneak attack on Germany. In the final analysis the Teutonic people of central Europe, now called Germans, were simply performing their ancient role as defenders of the White race in our European homeland.
>Against overwhelming odds of 10:1 in population, 100's to one in land area and 1,000's to one in resources, they were magnificent!
>What about a voting pool today if someone thinks it is possible to vote for White territories or states? First remove from the possible converts all who have someone in their family who has already mated with coloreds. The vast majority of White families have a sister, daughter, son, aunt, cousin, or whatever, mated to a non-White. They will usually support the interest of the mixed-race offspring over racial survival.
>But, let us assume optimistically that 10% of the population has no family members who have mixed. From that 10% we must cull perhaps half who are under the thrall of Judeo-Christianity and its race-mixing fanatics, like the Pope, like Jerry Falwell, like Pat Robertson. At least 99.99% of all who call themselves Christian deny their own race with fanatical passion. This leaves a pool of perhaps 5% from which to draw recruits. But from that 5% we must cull virtually all so-called "educators," virtually all who are wealthy, government employees, federal agents, politicians, lawyers, bankers, most of the military, cowards, fence-sitters, the greedy, the ignoble, the druggies, the drunks, the media whores, social workers, virtually all who draw checks from the government and all levels of police. Now you see why it is so hard to recruit large numbers into our alleged movement. As always, forever and always, revolutions come from the totally disenfranchised. In this age the disenfranchised are almost exclusively young, White males.
>From the facts alone one might be forgiven for concluding that there is no hope. But, that is not the case. However, we must consider our resources when formulating a plan. And we must fight smart, that is, cunning. Much of the literature disseminated within the "movement" over the last few decades calls for courage and heroism. That is fine if combined with wisdom and cunning. Unfortunately, our "leaders" have been prone to sending young, idealistic men off to be cannon fodder. A wise man does not paint a target (swastika) on his chest and dare the government to react.
>In the eyes of the system we are already criminals, simply because we resist genocide. In truth, the criminal system which rules over us is fueled by money. Let us not abandon the life line of all movements simply because the pursuit of money is the joy of Judah. Sometimes war is action other than guns or swords. In World War II Aryans killed Aryans, and Jews with money conquered the world. Materialism in the heart is not Aryan, but money is the gasoline for the engines of war. Dirty hands and a pure heart are not mutually exclusive. Victory goes to the cunning first, then to the brave.