>>4882
>they carefully crafted post-WW2 world to prevent the rise of such consciousness ever again..
I'd say they failed there, but with the money they have they prop rotten politicians and obtain control over judges and armies. Do not forget how laws are given by the population far more power than they have, hence why laws influence people because we are wired in our Aryan societies to believe in the law and think it's for good, so we'd rather think that politicians are cheating the law than thinking the law is written against us. ALL politicians I see and hear squabble over minor points and never go at the source of the issue, never even offer a very ambitious new model that would put into question the very existence of those large holdings that are the key to the Jews' control over the world. They are merchants, the worst kind there is, keeping inflating prices for their own gain, sucking the juices dry off economies. These profiteers intuitively need to control all the world's resources through these companies they manage. Nobody even has the courage to say that the entire economical model is defective, or when we get there you can bet it's coming from another communist in disguise who will try to sell the Marxian fraud as the one big solution. It's that frustrating, because nobody can attack the Jews and all the complex parasitic structure they built that hinges on a lot of divisive talk points and ideological fault lines. But the parasite is clever enough this time not to kill the host. The host suffers, some organs partially fail, but the host survives long enough for this torture to keep going. Down the line I still expect the Jews to proceed through a world wide but partial absolution on national debts, to inject enough happiness and leeway into the economy.
>>9831
>operating at a loss
The Jews have so much money that they can afford that so they can attack any economical activity and bring it down, then buy the scraps for nothing. They did that through the whole 20th century to buy all newspapers and drive those that refused to bow down into the gutter. There is no effective protection against unfair pricing because it's both too vague and not applied with enough zeal. Yet it should be easy to define, all a government would need to do is take an average of the poorest and most struggling companies and that alone would already show the minimal threshold prices should be found at, never to be left to drop below that line. Then the government would pick these values and add a little extra percentage to fix the new minimum price. Then Jews also bought the advertising companies, making it hard to newspapers hostile to Jews to get money through ads when the sales revenues alone weren't high enough. In some countries, a system of subsides was put into place, which virtually forced all newspapers wishing to obtain these funds to accept any limit put in place by their respective government. The government being obviously kiked to some severe extent already.
>Perhaps this is the true purpose of Uber; money is unimportant, even establishing a corporate monopoly is a secondary priority, a side benefit.
There always are several aspects to this. Overall, the overreliance on apps is really to get us dependent on the goyphone. Then electronic money. The idea is that down the road, in many years, technology will be so miniaturized that eventually a lot of systems will be held within a device so small that it will be implanted. It will be convenient, cool, faster, all automatized. Lazy bums will love it, geek will shill that crap like it cures cancer. There have already been experiments with this and implants in the hand. The other side to this the control of all aspects of life through the companies. They do not want competition. They want absolute control, which they always get closer to year after year. You spoke of paying with cash, but you won't be able to do that anymore. You need to be traced. Electronic money will show what you bought, where, when, to whom perhaps, and more.