/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

National Socialist and Third Position Discussion


New Thread
Name
×
Email
Subject*
Message*
Files* Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Thread]


Actual_political_compass.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1612x1610) Reverse
In anticipation of the old site being taken down, I have made screenshots of my most important posts for future discussion. To understand the references, you would need rudimentary understanding of classic philosophy, history, mathematics, physics, metaphysics and some mystery schools like Hermeticism and Pythagoreanism (whose ideas, such as monism, I am making a case against), as well as eastern and Vedic mysticism. While the subject deals with the nature of reality itself, basic knowledge of the aforementioned subjects should suffice for intuitive grasp. The reason why I would prefer for this thread to be separate from the religion thread is to avoid all the fallacies and appeal to nonexistent (or construed from very questionable sources) authority typically involved with "faith", especially taking into the account the fact that that historical sources have been routinely destroyed or altered, and bearers of certain knowledge (by blood or tradition) routinely persecuted and genocided (often by those who cry out in pain as they stab you, which ties into the real reason for the white genocide).

While these subjects inevitably involve religious themes and concepts (after all, true religion and true science are merely two different perspectives of the same knowledge, as our ancestors knew, not something opposed), the focus should be on reason and debate about ideas themselves. Which is far more nuanced than it seems, as, for example, the use of the term "rational" as a synon
Message too long. View the full text
98 replies and 54 files omitted. View the full thread
Zeus_Killing_Chronos.jpg
[Hide] (2MB, 4601x3681) Reverse
Ultimately this is the crux of the issue, is it based on the individual or society? Is it economic or cultural? Everyone loses the argument for failure to answer this question, and the perceived winners and continued insanity exist due to narratives and bias, albeit heavily one-sided today...
The meaning of life isn't some complex quandary bereft of answers, and yet it is both the most sought after and most ignored subject. Is a people determined by land or blood? Beliefs? Beliefs change, so how can that be an acceptable basis of identity? Why has choice superseded the intrinsic in importance, because it can be changed, when the very fact of its mutability means it is subservient to the intrinsic?

I would like to continue this discussion as I have found the answers, the issue is communicating them and getting others to understand them. The crux is understanding time, perfection, direction, physical reality, and consciousness.
Replies: >>5229 >>5240
>>5227
Time is merely our perception of change, largely based on entropy.
Perfection is a static state of being, if it changes it ceases to be.
Everything in physical reality is subject to entropy.
Therefore perfection cannot exist in physical reality.
Perfect forms can exist in the conscious mind, think x^3.
Therefore the conscious mind is the bridge between the physical and the realm of perfection as it can impact the physical and interact with the perfect realm of timeless forms.

Perfection while unobtainable, is still something to aspire to. It provides DIRECTION. 99% perfection is better than 98.9% perfection, no? The very fact it is unobtainable, that its pursuit is asymptotic, assures that life will never lose its direction or meaning if properly focused. Though the returns may diminish, the goal is still worthy and suits a realm of constant change. The only realm which consciousness can exist. Experience requires change, change requires time, time requires imperfection.
ChatGPT wrote that.
>>5227
the meaning of my life is to crush sand nigger skulls with baseball bats.
OP, are you still here?

althing.jpg
[Hide] (80.6KB, 653x458) Reverse
This may be uncomfortable for some people.
I do not see many reasons to expect that a complete fascist victory ends in a Man of the High Castle type society in the long term. I've often pondered what an isolated fascist nation would be like and concluded that, without the threat of impending attack, it would be pretty chill and folkish. 

Many fascists are righteously furious at what is being done to us by the jews. In the context of a world ruled almost entirely by genocidal jewish oligarchs, it is natural and good that fascists are militant.
What would a fascist nation look like? At first, no doubt it would be militant, armed, and prepared to wage nuclear war to survive. But what would a fascist nation post-victory look like?
Many imagine military marches everywhere, all the time, everyone in the military, the military is central to the thoughts and minds of all. Uniforms, guns, Panzers, and a dictator in a uniform who wears lots of medals and accolades. Some even say it'll be like Warhammer 40k, which is pretty cringe in my opinion.

I don't believe this is realistic or desirable: 
1. Jews are not going to hand us power. We will need to take it by force. This means that, by the end of a potentially 50 year struggle, much of the wealth of my country and many other White nations will be destroyed. Running a militarized state is extremely expensive as an army is essentially dead weight and the more men you remove from society, the less productive your economy will be. I am all for prioritizing culture over GDP, but this doesn't exactly create culture either. Therefore, once all enemies are defeated, there will be a strong impetus for the new fascist government to demobilize and get men back into the new economy. 

2. The only justification for maintaining a huge army post Revolution will be enemies. Say that the jews are dead and we Ethno-globe the niggers and Asians. Now what? We could turn on each other and wipe out life, if that is indeed our goal. But it isn't mine and I doubt that most White nationalists want to prove the jews right by immediately turning on each other the second they're gone. Combating communism will be extremely easy without jews and mass media run by jews. Communism has no appeal to anyone, especially working class White men. It exists solely because of mass media and jews, and even so, marxists are just anti-racist liberals these days, not genuine economic marxists. Even if there was some ideological foe we had to combat, doing so would not require uniforms and tanks, but social media and surveillance technology.

Once the enemy is gone, what is the objective? For me, I just want to live in a community that is not being flooded with niggers. I'd also like to celebrate and grow Anglo-Germanic culture in America again, as capitalism smothered our natural development and made us vulnerable to jewish subversion. Folk culture has been wiped out for most western nations and I would like to try again as if the past 300 years didn't happen. Obviously, I'm not overly concerned with making sure America creates a global empire. Perhaps others are more interested in this. To them I would ask: Yes, but why? What is the long term purpose? Is it spreading our currently non-existent culture? Is it populating the world with "Americans?" What if your own people do not want this? Who are you doing this for?

What would the government be like? 
Message too long. View the full text
7 replies and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
>>8838
I didn't initiate this feud. Jews did.
They could have just left us alone and they wouldn't be hated.
>>8831
New revolutionary governments are like this. They impliment popular reform, get rid of rampant corruption, and are a return to prosperty.... For about 5-10 years.
After that period, if the deep systemic, cultural, and divisive issues are not solved, the optimisim will fade and the new goverment will soon resemble the old. Being new in name only, as maladies ignored as a transitionary become a perment fixture.
His plans did however revolve around resolving said issue with social upheaval and complete destruction of the old establishment. Rather than the usual social stagnation and blending with the establishment.
How ever his plans weren't unique, only more recent than his peers, Lenin, Napoleon, Washington, etc. And yet they failed too, being replaced with the same conservatism they sought to destroy.
Which does reveal the crux of why he would have failed even without intervention, save for being a hundred years later. Systems do not fall for hate, nor do they last with love. They last when change would destroy the value it seeks to capture.
In conservatisms case, it is a throughly effective system in looting a docile populice, and will effectively steal far more wealth for any prospective revolutionaries for them to consider staying true and rejecting it.
I don't think fascism is a deterent against this, as it seeks to build wealth through the seziure of primary goods and the building of industry.
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8850 >>8852
>>8848
What if we get rid of the Jews though?
Replies: >>8874
>>8848
Grug version?
Replies: >>8874
>>8852
Retarded sophistry that ignores the role of the jews and shabbos goyim in the decay of White nations. The cycle of empires is a meme concept anyways. The post here >>8850 is what you should pay attention to.

Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera-1625005208.jpg
[Hide] (200.1KB, 510x799) Reverse
Let's get this started with the troublesome figure of Franco.
https://x.com/BorealBaron/status/1670935327878311936
>I read this same take about Saint Francisco Franco again and again, and I have to say that this amounts to a complete whitewashing of the revolutionary aims of the Spanish left and the success of Franco's counter-revolution. Let me explain
>Franco stopped a genocide of "conservative" people (just normal people who went to church or were resented by their leftist neighbors for whatever reason) that would have come as a result of the inevitable sovietization of Spain; hundreds of churches were destroyed by the left…
>…because they were seen as symbols of "reactionary thought," and around 70,000 were annihilated during their revolutionary terror. The anarchists ruled in catalonia and many other places (yes, we Spaniards are the only ones to take that ridiculous meme ideology seriously) and they didn't rule over the Catalan Parliament because their retard ideology forbade them from participating in electoral politics. They executed people at will—around 8,000 just in 1936—including many in the catalan nationalist right (something that has been completely…
>…erased from history by catalan nationalists because t
Message too long. View the full text
a0feeb6375c6626f55dae17ba444b804a1eaba1190a56b36838f28cc81aca6a8.jpg
[Hide] (114.3KB, 616x865) Reverse
JoseAntonioFEJONS.jpg
[Hide] (245.1KB, 707x906) Reverse
8481664f5a6f48ee79e6985e660e058c83846e548e42b69707f15cf5b383c904.jpg
[Hide] (103.3KB, 906x1280) Reverse
1cc5aba7b859a718d48a66d0ccd165ee49013cd82ae8fc2a896a568f25e16b6a.jpg
[Hide] (26.9KB, 657x369) Reverse
a7d1ff380b30033a00c73964e95e2578a47efd3eee9b986b34e1c50209d414f4.jpg
[Hide] (95.6KB, 1034x728) Reverse
>Primo de Rivera, the man who many revisionists see as "betrayed" by Franco, was able to get just one seat in parliament in 34, and his party didn't have enough muscle that could be compared to the freikorps or the SA.
>He was just a bourgeois kid ripping off italian fascism who was killed because the left were insane and paranoid about a fascist takeover. And despite all of this, Franco won an insurrectionary war against all odds and ruled for 40 years, but because Spain joined NATO and became a "democracy" after his death, that means he "lost" and nobody was saved from the left?
>We spaniards have a good climate; we love living well and sharing our lifestyle with others. We are not some north koreans who can live like drones in a permanent autarchic state. In the end the US-USSR coalition winning the war wasn't Franco's fault. But this doesn't stop some revisionist from claiming that Franco was a dummie for not joining Hitler's effort. Once Germany lost and Truman the rat was out of the picture…
>…Franco was perfectly reasonable in approaching Eisenhower. Franco was a very pragmatic leader, and that was his strongest virtue. He showed this when he united the carlists with the falangists, two factions with completely different conceptions of the state.
>And, most importantly, claiming that spain becoming a demo
Message too long. View the full text
90b1d2c130e56b762f81a150adc618164642a3538471429c234a8bbc209ac04a.jpg
[Hide] (121.7KB, 691x900) Reverse
e16f33227b0ae0642e7d8de849e85a99b4b3a0318de1d1671888cecca02f70de.jpg
[Hide] (223.4KB, 1024x662) Reverse
e48456f44197b87fd5afe614b191d4020d13f46a2d5db3d7e44ae0c347571dd0.jpg
[Hide] (50.2KB, 787x541) Reverse
The only reason for Franco's acceptance by the USA was because it was far more practical to keep this hardline conservative in place as long as they played him on the basis of his anti-communist engagement.
But José Antonio Primo de Rivera was the real man, a man Spain wasn't ready for.
falangism, and franco, or whatever, were so underwhelming and unnoteworthy. these were boomer ancestors to nowadays' xitter tradcath groyper nationalists. so goddamn uninteresting, just some lazy siesta-addled rightist intellecualite war of attrition against Reds, and then somehow this boring dinosaur became Kim Sung Gook Martínez or something. and then he croaked and didn't even leave a successor lmao. just a few decades of isolationist pope-fellating.

the worst part about franco is how ABHORRENT the uniforms are. ¿was he like totalmente ciego o algo así? oh my fucking god. so much UGLINESS. what misery to be reminded this slimy spanish sloth existed. this blemish had nothing to do with our Fascism.
Replies: >>8811
>>8771
It's a mutt catholic country. No surprise it went nowhere. It should be conquered again by norfs and all the dubious genetic creatures be removed.

c19bfd9c4ad990dff36dd526aab9c2d5fbdabfe5b8b89c3d6068b937105ed2da.jpg
[Hide] (194.9KB, 960x913) Reverse
Welcome to /fbc/

As a wise man once said, in a roundabout way, books are tools. They exist to inspire the coming man and other revolutionaries, and to aid the process of iteration. We, therefore, would be fools not to take advantage of them. 

Fascist Book Club plans to meet on a weekly to biweekly basis to share well-written insights on books chosen by /fbc/ members. The book of the week will be chosen in the thread, and after an allotted time period, anons will return to discuss their reading. Posts related to the chosen book should be high quality, and anons are expected to keep discussion civil and productive. Lastly, and most importantly, have fun with it! While the topics being discussed can be serious, there is no reason why you can't enjoy it. So, let's get started.
252 replies and 108 files omitted. View the full thread
RevoltAgainstTheModernWorld_Evola.pdf
(3.1MB)
>>4431
>Revolt Against The Modern World PDF
Sharing texts is one thing, but a book club is also about talking about their content.
I'm reading Moby Dick for the first time and so far it hasn't impressed me, over the years I've seen cuckchan /lit/ more and more promoting this book along with the bible as the greatest books ever written, as they began to hate Mishima and Evola more and more.
>Moby Dick
Part of it is an allegory for initiation through prolonged isolation within darkness. As a plain story it's probably not the most thrilling adventure of all tbf.
Has anyone heard of or read "Gagarin: A Cosmic Lie"?
The original title of that book seemingly published in Budapest in 1990 was "Gagarin - kozmikus hazugsag". I'm cautious with this, especially since the flaterfers seem to have made it theirs and I certainly do not want to waste my time reading even a small book that's one well disguised book about how we're living on some cosmic pancake.

Religion_is_fake_and_gay.jpeg
[Hide] (17.4KB, 800x1200) Reverse
The people of this movement like to think that it was better for the white race during pagan times—that Whites were less passive than they are now. Well, in reality, that was a yes and no. Yes, they did not subscribe to the cuckolded beliefs of christianity. No, they believed we had some sort of divine protection from the gods, among other cosmic bullshit similar to christianity. 

If Whites had abandoned the concept of spooks in the sky long ago, imagine what we would have achieved. We would have probably gone to the moon by the year 1500, colonized our solar system and neighboring star systems by the time Hitler was born, and became a type II civilization on the Kardashev scale by now. 

What would become of the other races if we abandoned the whole concept of religion or spooks in the sky? Well, they would simply be extinct. Because Whites are the best race possible within the limits of our universe's physics and biological laws, we would have likely been blasting the subhumans away with machine guns while they were still using bows and arrows and fucking swords. In addition to that, if we were an athiest society, we would have no qualms about wiping out subhuman races because we are not held back cucked moral codes and silly, childish superstition. Why, we would have wiped out the semitic races for the oil they stood on. Never mind being an existential threat.

In short, I think that Christcuckery and LARPaganism are both equally harmful to to our race in some way o
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8733 >>8741
It's because of materialism we're in this abjectly horrible situation, you moron.
>>8718 (OP) 
Based Ben Klassen reader.
Christians are the ones who destroyed the third position revival years ago and attacked various imageboards where our views were prevalent, just as /leftypol/ did so many years ago. As far as I've seen, there's never been a pagan movement screwing everything up. All the pagan or non-Abrahamic right-wingers I know tend to be pretty much in their own right, caring more about their lives and loved ones than using the Bible as a tool, both of conquest and of cope instrument.

Apart from that, last month I read Ancient Cities by Fustel de Coulanges, and although the author tries to imply that human society evolved in a positive way thanks to Christianity and certain revolutions, When you read the book from a tribalist and modern perspective you see how weak the family, patriotic and genetic nucleus has become thanks to the loss of the kin gods.

I'm not saying I want to see a bunch of Viking larpers, but I would prefer an Evola-like traditionalism than all this empty and cringe-worthy "Christ is Kang!" we have now.
>>8718 (OP) 
Christians are low information, low IQ LARPers.
The problem is that a huge chunk of our race are low information, low IQ natural LARPers.
If there were no Christianity or no religion, then they would have created one. Maybe it would have been better. I believe that anything natural and organic would be better than the artificial imposition of the semitic religion. We can see that the closest Christianity comes to being fun and meaningful is when it adopted pagan values and traditions.
But so long as a huge portion of our race think that repeating mindless slogans is spiritual, religion will remain.

2.jpeg
[Hide] (7.4KB, 199x253) Reverse
The average IQ of Israelis is 94, they're ugly and mediocre.

To demoralize the public, these Middle Easterners were pushed into the spotlight and made the center of everything.

The purpose of demoralization is to make people give up on community projects, to lose faith in humanity and pursue things as individuals because they don't trust others. Demoralized populations are easily exploited.

By putting Jews in the center of every organization, people disperse from those organizations because their impression of them is that they are disreputable and mediocre.

If you had a math society and the math society advertised itself with a Jew presenting a thesis that 1+1 did not equal 2 and the society endorsed it and paraded that Jew around on media, everyone would break with that organization and lose faith in human organizations in general. 

Using a mediocre Jew as the face of an organization causes White people to abandon that organization and do it enough times and they will have no faith in the quality of people in general and not organize towards their collective interests. 

This is a way of breaking down opposition to governments, corporations, and secret cabals by causing people to become individualists that can't accomplish much of anything as individuals.
7 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>8645
>The average IQ of Israelis is 94
because of sand nigga population's contribution
katana
didnt-read.gif
[Hide] (366.2KB, 220x172) Reverse
>>695 (OP) 
>reddit spacing
>paragraphs composed of single sentences
tik tok brained zoomer retard detected
>>735
>Stop using the White term nigger
No.
>>696
>invents a new computer
Does it even compute?

Captured_Serbs.jpg
[Hide] (47KB, 746x487) Reverse
Upshot;
The right will lose virtually every realistic civil war scenario because
>The GOP will never go against the system
>All institutions are loyal to the ((( left ))) Jewish indications my own
>Comparisons with Afghanistan & Vietnam are not applicable to an insurgency within the US
>the military & police will not defect Who would they even defect to? We have no large organization for them to even defect to. See Syria as an example of what military defection takes
>attacking infrastructure will just alienate the population
>the right is incredibly disorganized and fractured. Moreso than the left. There is a LOT of backstabbing on the right.
>the right is an exceptionally low trust society and everyone calls everyone else a fed
>Conservatives won't even sacrifice a weekend to protest abortion, which they claim is as bad as the holocaust, they're not going to sacrifice their lives for freedom

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcYYgcGjrP0
21 replies and 3 files omitted. View the full thread
>>8006
>Furthermore, for some reason we have this purity spiral induced expectation of perfect perfection among our public figures.
Are you going to shill for Trump next? Because this "purity spiral" you kvetch at is simple observational skill allowing a minimally intelligent person realize that nobody in power has our race's interests at heart, every single guy in the last decade or so that got touted as /ourguy/ turned out to be a shabbos goy, a glownigger deradicalizer, or a simple grifter lowlife. It's insane that a whole decade has passed and yet there's still ostensibly redpilled guys here that keep waiting for a public figure to personally give them the OK to behead kikes and gun down shabbos goyim. Stop fucking looking to Trump or Kanye or whoever you care to name for approval and justification, stop waiting for  the next Hitler and stop waiting for ideal circumstances to act. There's no political solution to our plight, nobody in government will stand for us, nobody in the public sphere is going to be the Chosen One. Hitler became leader of our struggle not because he was in power or because he had a public voice and a following. He attained those things because he took it upon himself to lead, because he had the initiative to unite those that were fighting for the same thing, and because he had the tenacity to see it through, come hell or high water.

The real prob
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8017
>>8007
No. However, I have noticed that literally every single man who does step forward to lead gets torn down, not by the jews but by our own side.

Let us examine who, presently, are the most influential and IRL active leaders of the national right.
Thomas Rousseau is objectively, pound for pound, the most active physically IRL leader in the American national right. In terms of raw numbers, Patriot Front is probably around 6-800 at best. However, their level of activity is surpassed by not only none on the nationalist right, but literally no organization (trump rallies are not organization) on the conservative right.
So what's wrong? Half of us will not support him because they think he is a grifter or a fed. The other half tells themselves that he isn't pure because he doesn't talk about the jews enough.

Nick Fuentez a based border hopper. He is doing the jobs White people won't do. In seriousness, he commands the attention of thousands of young men, and has actually done things IRL, which is more than most e-celebs can say. He has created a platform that, as far as I am aware, gives a place without censorship for White men to speak freely. Like Andrew Torba but without the boomer facebook vibe.
So what's wrong? Again, there's a million little nitpicks against him. Half of our side claims he is a grifter and a fed and the other half nitpicks at his ideas or say, "Well! He isn't doing ENOUGH!" from the comfort of their literally done nothing chairs.

I hate to draw a blank after a list of two but I cannot immediately think of actually active nationalists. There are several small organizations led by other men.

I fully expect you to call me a fag for even mentioning these men. But they are literally it as far as American nationalists go. This is the problem. Every single time someone steps up to do something beyond talking, we all join forces to tear them down. If Hitler existed today, we would find reasons to hate him, call him a fed, call him a grifter, and denounce him as not pure enough. I am not saying that Nick Fuentez is Hitler. What I am saying is that we need to rise above our weird, self sabotaging culture. I will proudly promote anyone who is using their time on earth to stand up for my people, even if they are not perfect beings of pure perfect perfection. 

>there's still ostensibly redpilled guys here that keep waiting for a public figure to personally give them the OK to behead kikes and gun down shabbos goyim.
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8178
>>8017
>Thomas Rousseau
Have you considered the possibility that nobody supports him because nobody knows about him?
He's been doing politics for years now and he's still stuck at the level of
>literally who?

>If Hitler existed today, we would find reasons to hate him, call him a fed
akshually

Also, why none of our most clever people has even bothered getting inside and taking control of say National Alliance? Pierce once managed to get something like a million people behind him if I remember correctly.
He should have shilled Cosmotheism to get tax breaks while sliding subtle pro-White material and then proselytize ad nauseam.
Muslims have some supposedly usury free banks. Why don't we? And then when these banks have enough leverage, why wouldn't we tie them to say, huh, "Caucasian" interests?
See, there's no real strategy. Lots of talks, lots of ideology, but just no big plan, no organization, no real networking and a constant fear of being le ebil raysiss.
Replies: >>8609
>Thomas Rousseau
Looks like he's about to become slightly more famous now that Mr. X has targeted him and his group.
>>8178
>Also, why none of our most clever people has even bothered getting inside and taking control of say National Alliance? Pierce once managed to get something like a million people behind him if I remember correctly.
He never properly trained or had an accepted successor or two before he passed away, that fault is on him.

But_Race_is_only_a_Social_Construct_tho....gif
[Hide] (837.1KB, 2970x2255) Reverse
ITT, we hammer out some "canned responses" to common anti-White arguments. 
Let's share common counters we have heard and refine concise counter arguments.

I will initiate by sharing The Mantra, 
<YOu ARe A RaCIsT!!!!1
You only say that because I am White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
<but racist!
Africa for the Africans
Asia for the Asians
White nations for everyone!
<but... racist fascism
Anti-Whites say that there is a race problem. This race problem only exists in White nations, White schools, White communities, and White people.
The Final Solution to the race problem is for my race, White people, to be blended out of existence through mass immigration and forced assimilation.
The Final Solution to the race problem is the Final Solution to the White problem.
Genocide.
Message too long. View the full text
18 replies and 8 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>8478 + 2 earlier
>>4726 (OP) 
Diversity means finding a peaceful White community, flooding it with hostile non-Whites, and then blaming White people for the resulting dysfunctionality.
Diversity is a monumental gaslighting psyop.
Replies: >>8485
If you ever need practice shooting down conservacuck arguments, you have a perfect practice ground right here: >>8120
Replies: >>8481 >>8482
>>8480
I am the OP of both these threads, lol.
I presume you're the guy upset that I'm calling you out for proposing we kill most White people.
I am way more revolutionary than you. You actively are trying to isolate White nationalists and keep us weak. You didn't frame it that way, but you effectively said this yourself.
Replies: >>8482
>>8480
>>8481
Oh wait, I'm thinking of a different thread, also mine.
Yes, basically all the threads that explore how to actually get from zero power to revolution are mine. I should take pride in being virtually the only one seriously talking about this, but it actually fills me with dread.

Anyway, I presume you're the guy who desperately keeps trying to argue against the strawman that I oppose killing niggers. I do not.
However, I am serious enough about White Revolution that I do not advocate publicly espousing that we should commit global genocide. It's a bad look and wins us no friends while handing easy propaganda to the enemy.
I am much more interested in awakening White people so we can actually get out of purity spiraling image boards and into the real world.

If we do not, we will be spamming "Ethnoglobe" and dragging each other down for not being a cartoon character for the next 80 years. Then, when we are old and still just as powerless, and we're being lined up in front of mass graves, we will realize too late that play-acting as extremists is LARP. Real revolutionaries ask ourselves every single day: How can we get from where we are to where we want to be. Does posturing like apes over how pure we are really destabilize the jewish regime? Or is it pointless hot air that only hinders the efforts of more serious revolutionarie
Message too long. View the full text
>>8478
>flooding it with hostile non-Whites
No, it does not require them to be hostile. Their mere presence is all that's needed. In fact the more hostile the better for obvious reasons. You don't want to become friends with them.

Advance_White_Australia.jpg
[Hide] (890.8KB, 2000x2000) Reverse
Welcome to Silver City, white. I dont mean to know your business fren, but you been searching long? searching for here? Myself, I was lost for the longest time, trying to make it work in the city. Trying to make a big salary into a ticket to escape.  Finally the crowd of strangers pushed me out, I'd been there all my life up til then. 

You'll find a empty cottage at the edge of the forest. The former residents left for the siren song of cosmopolitan sophistication.  Bright lights of the big cities, more like poor dumb animals freezing in the headlights of oncoming cars. They generally learn to stop saying they're from here, being whites from peasant stock isnt valuable in a melting pot, although its more like a cauldron really. 

The community here is too poor to interest hook nosed parasites and muds are supposed to be scared of forests, but maybe its the geomantic hexagons alligning in this valley that makes it so good for volk. Work hard and build up Silver City and You'll find it a good place to do esoteric research and have a bath, maybe shit post a little. So stay a while and refit your field gear, You'll be heading out again on the search party soon. You can trust white survival city to be here when you need to return.
367 replies and 235 files omitted. View the full thread
Good_bye_FREN.jpg
[Hide] (439.5KB, 1000x1681) Reverse
Brother Aryans.
I have suffered a catastrophe and am fighting for my honor. 
This has to do with my war crimes tribunal. 
I am innocent but I fear I am finished. 
Seig Heil. Heil Hitler.
Replies: >>8228
Major false flag in Australia. 
Mossad left a caravan with a bomb in it just lying around with a fake as fuck note that said "fuck the Jews". 
Then it seems a random criminal stole the caravan, having no idea what was in it, then called police.

This follows no less than 5 fake terror attacks, carried out by paid criminals or unknown actors. The Jews can't keep getting away with this
Replies: >>7645 >>8229
>>7638
you sound like a Facebook nut, you indecipherable fuck.

Genetic fallacy. Have any GOOD attacks taken place, e.g. attacks which eradicate multiple Systemites or a System institution?
>>7358
'_'7
>>7638
>Mossad left a caravan with a bomb in it just lying around with a fake as fuck note that said "fuck the Jews". 
>Then it seems a random criminal stole the caravan, having no idea what was in it, then called police.
What was the fuse on this bomb?
>This follows no less than 5 fake terror attacks, carried out by paid criminals or unknown actors. The Jews can't keep getting away with this.
More details please.

milk.jpg
[Hide] (26KB, 494x550) Reverse
>Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom. ~Aristotle
If we understand what woke us up, we may be better able to awaken others or suggest media that will steer our unenlightened kinsmen down the righteous path.

Back in 2015, I got into the atheist scene, arguing with Christians. Eventually, I figured out that SJWs were way worse. I went to college so I was then exposed to the brunt of anti-White, anti-male hate. I believe that the feminist hypocrisy was most offensive to me.
This was in tandem with the race riots but I believe I was still a libertarian at heart and kept trying to get the blacks to understand that we should all just treat each other equally. What actually set me down the righteous path was encountering one guy doing Bob Whitaker's Mantra in a youtube comment. The whole, 
>They say that there is this "race" problem and that the final solution to this "race" problem is for non-Whites to pour into White countries and ONLY into White countries. They say they are anti "racist" what they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
That sort of thing. Naturally, my propagandized brain freaked out and I argued with him. But these points intrigued me and I searched out more information to learn more about this new "threat" to my perfect libertarian worldview.
I eventually discovered WhiteRabbitRadio and listened to his podcasts.
I cannot explain it, but it gradually cli
Message too long. View the full text
51 replies and 14 files omitted. View the full thread
>>7942
>Guess we learned from that one. You CANNOT negotiate with liberals. They are pathologically insane.
They are feminine. Liberalism is literal laissez-faire in essence, submissive, passive, all in accepting the unacceptable. Weaklings who will so often turn coats and betray people when they see fit.
Replies: >>8063
>>7909
Every single white alive has been lied to about certain subjects their entire lives, and that number of subjects has increased over time. There's real time gaslighting going on and it's a major problem. That's the sad reality of the world we live in, and we need to acknowledge that when dealing with the general populace. Some people will reject being told the truth, others will skeptically doubt you but may eventually come around, and another group will admit what you say to be true.

If an individual learns the truth about one specific thing, that what they were told was a fabricated lie, then it naturally brings into question everything related to that subject. That one subject might pull into question tangential subjects and then the whole house of cards comes crashing down. Sometimes it's just a small redpill to form a crack in the conditioning, and then the redpill becomes self-perpetuating, self radicalizing.

I do have to ponder the merits of attacking the basis of a concept vs attacking the outcomes. Like pointing out how humans have interacted for thousands of years and massacred one another, but racism as a concept is barely a century old. In contrast to say, niggers are dumb and violent, it’s ok to be racist to them. Do we need to chip away at each level or do we just take a sledgehammer to the foundations and let the entire lie collapse under it’s own weight?

Despite all the censorship
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8063
>>7960
If only that was so.
Liberalism is anything but laissez-faire. It's about enforcing total conformity to a fanatic religion. 

>>8051
>Some people will reject being told the truth, others will skeptically doubt you but may eventually come around, and another group will admit what you say to be true.
My challenge, I suppose, is to learn to humble myself when talking with idiots. I tend to get angry and insulting. I must stop doing that. It serves no purpose.

> pointing out how humans have interacted for thousands of years and massacred one another, but racism as a concept is barely a century old. In contrast to say, niggers are dumb and violent, it’s ok to be racist to them.
I am very much in the former camp in argument style. I feel that the former attacks the very foundation of the belief in racism while the latter plays into it.
To put another way, the average response to the latter is either
>lol
or
>Dats Racist Dough

Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>8064
>>8063
>Liberalism is anything but laissez-faire. It's about enforcing total conformity to a fanatic religion. 
That's leftism or right-wing conservatism and both have an absolute love for democracy. Liberals just to where it's the most comfy at a given time and where the money is.
Replies: >>8065
>>8064
Yeah but no one means "classical liberalism" when they say liberal. It's a dead ideology. Maybe libertarians but even they shy away from the term. Leftism is like a cancer. Once it infected the word of liberalism, its body putrefied.

Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1