>>13582
Is this bait? Are you for real? What difference would that make? --I guess it could even fuck over Hitler sooner to give another man legitimacy over himself and effectively have a diarchy (that didn't work well for Mussolini, when the going got tough the "figurehead" bailed and jumeped ship, like Machiavelli warned people generally do when the heat is on).
That is the lame, trivial point of many constitutional monarchists who appeal to a figurehead with their "seat is taken" mentality like George Orwell does. Honestly, it's not far from how the Integralists think with Jesus. Using a ceremonial figurehead to limit a dictator or Jesus as a limit--it's just another device of mixed constitutionalists who advocate for mixed & limited royalty... and steer for more political pluralism or even democracy...
...It's more fool's gold fake monarchy sentiment... again, like Orwell says... an "escape valve" -- makes me want to vomit but sadly this is a very popular talking point with e-monarchists these days who like the "seat is taken" and "sit on my lap" ideology and think these actually prevent dictators--that didn't work out for Italy and Mussolini and Victor Emmanuel III, neither did it work out for the do-nothing kings of the Merovingian dynasty, particularly Childeric III, Pope Zachary was asked this--
>Whether it was fitting that those who held the royal title but lacked true power should remain kings, or whether the crown should belong to the one who actually wielded authority
Even the Pope thought the latter--crown should belong to the one who actually wielded authority.
Eh, this might be sarcasm given the image you posted. I don't want to bother posting more in a thread honoring Hitler, but you know how to bait me, anon, and play me like a fiddle--because that's the epitome of fake and gay monarkiddie sentiment right there.