/b/ - Random

526f10b525d63343fd3727be7bff5e8c142d6d0003f5ac29868da8a9d371ff8b.png
[Hide] (8.9MB, 2803x4096) Reverse

0a6643688a55c1444f8e095bcf6c89ce8ec50a5150c12013cfda297ab91eccf4.png
[Hide] (202.4KB, 450x300) Reverse

>>320447 (OP) 
The image is even funnier if you know what happens after that.
It becomes even more funny when you know that Arcueids appearance was based on a (white woman) model.
It becomes super funny when you find out that she came out of hiding a few years ago and is now trying to farm for attention by saying "hey im the model that arcueid was based on". She admits that she hasn't actually read Tsukihime.

your entire habit inducing, thieving, whoring generation disgusts me
fairness would be to rip your insides out, hang you from a tree so we can expose you for the heartless, desensitized little shit you are

IMG_0126.jpg
[Hide] (508.2KB, 1111x1618) Reverse

Get a blow job. 
It’ll change your life forever

>>320487
3dpd looks like a hairless gorilla

>>320487
I'm never giving up on my virginity.

9912be8c4b2e0dd87f3d3afa17f75ae40e228ed140ebfb2c7e6bbe257aa5a9f9.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1562x1736) Reverse

>>320478
>fairness would be to rip your insides out, hang you from a tree
Funny, that's not terribly far off from what happens to Arcueid after OPs image.

I just jerk off to ai porn. It looks realistic, but I know no woman is being desired by me.

>>320501
>It looks realistic
Why do you need realism? Does 2d not do it for you? Why stoop to literal slop?

>>320503
The only problem I ever had with porn was the fact that my dopamine reward mechanisms were being exploited by the woman, meaning she has the power over me to get me aroused, didn't like that, but that isn't a problem with ai slop porn
2d porn is fine, and I still go to it sometimes, but the capacity to specify all phenotypic aspects of a woman and put her in any situation you want is hard to beat

male_vs_female_show.jpg
[Hide] (31.5KB, 500x356) Reverse

>>320458
That reminds me of this image

>>320529
that means nothing to me

you can take the monkey out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the monkey

>>320551
Nyooooo

>>320541
In both occasions women are being narcissists and probably know next to nothing about said materials

>>320458
She may have been the model but she really looks nothing like Arcueid

>>320907
https://www.amandadyermedia.com/thefacebehindarcueid
She definitely  looks nothing like Arcueid anymore.
Not going to post any images for reasons that should be obvious.

>>320945
wtf why do white women age so bad.

>>320950
All women age bad

>>320950
Age emphasises masculine traits

>>320952
Milkmired roasties.

>>320945
What's going to happen is that /robowaifu/ developers will use the recordings of real women In their primes as a template to create the replacement for female companionship as a whole.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcx6jDQgZk0

It will destroy us.

57b6ff2def65602655ca78ead800ef849970488c709e820401b9474b8e37a4b2.png
[Hide] (710.8KB, 661x1134) Reverse

>>321120
>use the recordings of real women In their primes as a template
If you're referring to voices, this is already possible, and has been since 2023.
>the replacement for female companionship as a whole
That's going to take a bit longer. And if 3DPD women really can't compete with a bit of silicone and metal, then that's their problem.
>It will destroy us.
Good.

>>321122
Robot wives will be the harbingers of the endtimes once they are such high quality that human females couldn't possibly compete with them for male attention.

But robot wives cannot get pregnant, they cannot bear children.

Human males will rutt with their artificial wombs fruitlessly, there will be no offspring born from these otherwise "perfect" unions that more closely resemble a master and his comely sex slave who is steadfastly loyal and unfailingly obedient.

Birthrates will plummet from low to functionally zero.

The robot apocalypse won't be from robots who betray, but from those who obey. Not from those who want us to die, but who only wish for us to be happy.

The human species will have gone extinct because the robots we've made to replace our lovers will love us to death, and continue to love our remains once we inevitability pass on.

Exactly as we have intended them to.

>>321120
Why do you do the least efficient things?
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/OIIe75dVr0c

>>321137
More like the government will deploy sex bots that will make chad sterile and/or retarded cripple

873bb0224fdb6c2eb0c3a1bf828ed09b5f6be897d675ea86316ab989cf41952f.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1536x2048) Reverse

>>321137
>But robot wives cannot get pregnant, they cannot bear children.
Artificial wombs are making a lot of progress, so they might be able to bear children. Eggs have to come from somewhere, though.
>Birthrates will plummet from low to functionally zero.
Or babies can be made in factories through the Bokanovsky method.
>and continue to love our remains once we inevitability pass on.
That's assuming that they have been programmed to do that.

>>321158
Some brave new shitposting in this thread