/b/ - Random

only the dead can know peace from this FUN


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


 Dress to impress!


Ape_skeletons.png
[Hide] (211.1KB, 1081x588) Reverse
Animals are conscious beings just like humans.
To eat animal, it is equal to eating human.
Humans = organized nazi mafia that voted/decided to murder other beings (outside the mafia).
Humans have almost the same skeleton and internal organs like other species. So if you are eating animals you are practicing cannibalism.
If you eat animals or commit harm to other animals or humans, you are committing this suffering to yourself. Separate minds/brains are just a illusion.
Comparative-view-of-skeletons-of-man-and-horse-C.jpg
[Hide] (214.6KB, 1247x1049) Reverse
Animals have brains like we do, they feel almost same what we feel.

Killing alone is evil, but some like chinks even torture for fun before eating. Even whites do this with crabs.
This thread is equal to sophistry.
Replies: >>317047
>>317045
I won't extend my respect or "rights" to anything that is not reciprocating the sentiment. And inability to do something is not the same as refraining from it. That would be a false equivalence.
Replies: >>317057
Human_next_ape_skeleton.jpg
[Hide] (72.8KB, 640x480) Reverse
Evolution created you. For evolution, human and a deer is same thing, equal, just another organism that eats food and poops.
Replies: >>317052 >>317098
>>317049
And how is that relevant to me? My standpoint is my priority.
Replies: >>317066
>>317047
Plant eating animals like deer are not eating meat and not eating you. So you have no rights to murder and eat them.
You could only eat carnivores like wolves.
But even then, it's just better to eradicate, euthanize all wolves.

Also, you make a separation that, "you" and "anything" are something different. But this is wrong assumption. The consciousness of other being and your one is the same thing. There is only one consciousness in the universe.
>>317057
A bull can disembowel you for their own reasons unrelated to their diet preferences. Doesn't change a thing on some fundamental level.
Replies: >>317070
>>317057
And you calling for dismantling the food chains/nets looks to me very similar to marxists calling for workers overthrowing "the bourgeois tyranny" on some pattern recognition level. Radical solutions for radically retarded.
Replies: >>317088 >>317585
>>317052
>And how is that relevant to me? My standpoint is my priority.
You believe that you are separate from other minds, but this is a illusion.
When you punish other animals, you do this to yourself, in another timeframe. There is only one mind receiver in the universe.

You really think that everything started when you were born and everything ends when you die?
Replies: >>317067
>>317066
A byproduct of my brain can't exist independently of my brain.
Replies: >>317088
how braindead do people have to be to take any of this thread seriously?
Replies: >>317069 >>317072
>>317068
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
>>317061
>A bull can disembowel you for their own reasons unrelated to their diet preferences. Doesn't change a thing on some fundamental level.
Bulls are aggressive and dumber than you. I am not saying you could be friends with a bull and play cards or sing songs with them. But if you are smarter than them, you shouldn't murder them or torture them, you should have responsibility and compassion toward dumber beings.
Replies: >>317683
no_you_piece_of_shit.jpg
[Hide] (39.5KB, 601x595) Reverse
Plants can talk and have a consciousness. So if we were to stop eating meat, we need to stop eating plants also
Replies: >>317074 >>317107
>>317068
>how braindead do people have to be to take any of this thread seriously?
This thread is 100% serious, why do you think it isn't?
>>317057
>So you have no rights
Nothing has any right. It is just strong dominating the weak.
Replies: >>317107
>>317071
If only, lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorum_sensing
Replies: >>317076
>>317042 (OP) 
it's just ridiculous
every part of your post is wrong
the assumptions are wrong, the implications are wrong, the conclusions are wrong, none of it makes any sense
it's like you were competing in a "try to include the most logical fallacies challenge"
Replies: >>317107
>>317074
https://sciencesensei.com/25-plants-that-literally-talk-to-each-other-and-how-they-do-it/
Wrong retard
Replies: >>317077 >>317136
>>317076
Learn to read. 
>If only that were true and nothing else as well.
I didn't call you a liar, I demonstrated how deep that rabbit hole can go.
Replies: >>317078
>>317077
Who are you quoting?
Replies: >>317079
>>317078
Myself.
Replies: >>317081
3cce359b7b56837ce52d7814a6555c9f55f7e877f696293559c5be35f8f0c1f0.png
[Hide] (4.9KB, 857x29) Reverse
>>317079
Replies: >>317082
>>317081
>greentext can't paraphrase
Another demonstration. Slightly different.
Replies: >>317083
>>317082
Who are you quoting?
Replies: >>317084
>>317083
<who knows?
Replies: >>317085
>>317084
Who are you faggot quoting?
Replies: >>317086
>>317085
A faggot.
>>317065
Radical solutions are good if they are justified.

>>317067
>A byproduct of my brain can't exist independently of my brain.
Wrong. Brains are made of atoms, somehow these atoms produce mind and consciousness. Other humans and animals have similar brain atoms and they have mind in same way, same technique. So your mind is not different and separate from other minds, it's the same process.
Replies: >>317090
88944fa5c0b68c7a9bf6b37f4007174e182d749d8c16ad0ca0161ec71374de26.png
[Hide] (477.8KB, 607x608) Reverse
>>317042 (OP) 
>>317088
A difference between a painting and a pile of pigment plus a clear canvas. Metaphorically. Or you wouldn't have a reason to fear lobotomy or any other brain injury.
Replies: >>317136
>>317042 (OP) 
yeah theres a lot we can learn from nature other than empathy towards our equals(animals). like the fact that bonobos practice casual sex and are seen engaging in homosexuality. maybe if we learnt from nature not to be bigoted and homophobic..... that would be nice.....
OBLIGATE_CARNAVORE.jpg
[Hide] (90.2KB, 600x603) Reverse
Bambi_Goes_KETO.webm
[Hide] (3.1MB, 406x720, 00:21)
>>317049
This is the most retarded, ignorant take on Adaptation of the species that I've ever read.
It must be that weak vegan Poojeet who goes around shitting up imageboards to try to convert anons to eating the same filthy shit that he does.

Hey Ramjiv SukDeep, or whatever, did you know that Every single living thing on this planet eats something else?
Even a carrot will gleefully feast upon your rotting corpse.

Let's hope that that happens sooner than later.
https://youtu.be/b2BKKeiYH24
Replies: >>317179
>rights
>You're smarter so you have responsibility
>There is no separation of life in nature so you are like any other animal and thus can't eat other animals for some reason
Hope you know the only reason we don't eat people is because it easy to get sick from it. I'd be fine when taking all the retards that think eating anything is moral issue, and giving them cancer where they grow delicious tumors that we can harvest to eat. They get to be martyrs and we get meat
Replies: >>317179
>>317071
>Plants can talk and have a consciousness. So if we were to stop eating meat, we need to stop eating plants also
Plants do not have consciousness similar to animals, they cannot suffer when they are eaten.

>>317073
>Nothing has any right. It is just strong dominating the weak.
If you were really strong, you wouldn't punish and torture weaker ones. Like God, should care about little beings, not kill them.

>>317075
Can you prove your claims? It looks like you are in full ego defense mode, trying to protect your murderous lifestyle.
Chicken_Tractor.jpg
[Hide] (32.4KB, 600x337) Reverse
NIGGERS_BTFO...but_they'll_still_bitch_about_it.jpg
[Hide] (164.6KB, 1200x1598) Reverse
If_only_you_knew_how_बुरी_चीजें_वास्तव_में_हैं--472--.jpg
[Hide] (254.5KB, 403x481) Reverse
>>317107
>If you were really strong, you wouldn't punish and torture weaker ones.
NTA, but with the exception of socially maladapted, mentally ill people, Western Whites do NOT punish and torture their livestock.
>b-b-but muh greenpeace chicken expose's
those are derivative of the profit-driven needs of those who control most of the slavegoyim's food supply.
small farm farmers and ranchers care very much for their livestock. 
Guess what? Efforts were made to mass produce "Free-range" uncaged chickens, and you know what they did? They all lumped up and on top of each other in one corner of a 10,000 sq.ft. yard.
There was no abuse, they had all their needs met; food, water, play stimulus, sky above if they wanted it...
they did what chickens always have done. 

You ever see how predators from snakes all the way up to big cats and bears eat their prey?
ALIVE. 
So spare me the bleeding heart bullshit and muh feels about how operating under our biological dietary imperatives is somehow bad.
It's not even a moral thing. Societies who have future time orientation and the ability to raise and keep livestock, with the exception of the Chinks, whom have had most of their care for wildlife superseded but multiple generations of overpopulation and famine, will treat their animals with the care and respect due to living things that are people's livelihoods.
I will say that with modern technology and knowledge, those who eat meat and other animal products should be more involved with the process. Knowing your local farmer, and buying direct would not only have a great impact on the reduction of the consooomeristic waste involved, let alone the healthiness and nutritive value of the food itself.

Post brown Dravidian hand, SukDeep
Replies: >>317180 >>317181
>>317107
>If you were really strong, you wouldn't punish and torture weaker ones. Like God, should care about little beings, not kill them.
>Trying to trying to dictate how the strong should behave
The only thing you can do is associate or not.
Strong men don't have to be gentle, altruistic, or empathetic, what makes them strong is their capacity to enforce their will, what they will is irrelevant.
As far God goes, stop thinking your morally is anything but an evolving set of thinking patterns to help you and your group survive, and God has no need of it.
Replies: >>317195
63539a32a15921ab1dc13bb40ad3551708517702b6e30f9ca5d67b22443c0a53.png
[Hide] (253.1KB, 400x300) Reverse
>>317107
>Plants do not have consciousness similar to animals, they cannot suffer when they are eaten.
Explain this then:
https://sciencesensei.com/25-plants-that-literally-talk-to-each-other-and-how-they-do-it/
Replies: >>317118 >>317120
MARKY_MARK_and_the_FUNKY_BUSH.gif
[Hide] (792KB, 350x230) Reverse
>>317116
:O
>>317116
Is a computer aware just because they can send 'talk' to each other?
Replies: >>317124 >>317125
>>317120
A computer cannot run on its own. It needs human intervention for it to work
>>317120
I guess plants react in slow motion compared to animals, but life is as life does.
Replies: >>318564
>>317042 (OP) 
I'm an apex fucking predator, I eat whatever i want.
I'd eat people too if i wanted
Replies: >>317129
>>317128
The closer to apex, the more pollutant accumulation. Yuck.
>>317076
Sending some signals to nearby plant doesn't mean they have brain and suffering.

>>317090
>A difference between a painting and a pile of pigment plus a clear canvas. Metaphorically. Or you wouldn't have a reason to fear lobotomy or any other brain injury.
Lobotomy will damage your mind because the brain atoms need to be connected in specific ways and they hold your memory.
But what I am saying is that, other humans and animals they have brain made of same physics like yours, and there is a single receiver of the mind, in the universe. When you harm someone, you harm yourself.
Replies: >>317153
Who_is_the_master_who_makes_the_grass_green....jpg
[Hide] (95.9KB, 1200x800) Reverse
Just_a_lump_of_elements....jpg
[Hide] (80.7KB, 640x480) Reverse
1609097045881.jpg
[Hide] (64.8KB, 680x680) Reverse
>>317136
>Sending some signals to nearby plant doesn't mean they have brain and suffering.
A significant amount of a human "Brain" is energetically and chemically connected to the current temporal gut flora. Neuronal connections aside, the processes that make it work are not singularly human, but ARE synergistic.
It follows then, that there is little difference between a complex network of living plants communicating via chemicals and energetic activations,(not even getting into Fungal networks,) and that of the symbiosis of human nervous system interactions.

Also, HARM is a human conception borne of EGO and means nothing on a cosmic scale of the time that the "Big Picture"
Are Unicorns real?

Is the Thought of a Unicorn a real thought?
Is the destruction of the sand mandala HARM?
How can you know?
>>317153
Your longing for connecting is affecting your judgement
Replies: >>317234
I am not against treating animals with more dignity, but the reality is that life feeds on life. You are no better for denying the same privileges to plants, which most certainly are feeling beings themselves. Some people believe even minerals are living as they do share some properties with what is traditionally identified as life. Shaping one's diet around the principle that suffering should be minimized is futile because you will always be consuming another being in order to sustain your own life, then.
Factory husbandry certainly is evil, but the underlying problem is there are too many "people" on the planet now. The global population should be reduced by a good 75% at least (starting with non-white regions of course). Quite a few problems are caused by human overpopulation, actually. The diet I believe would be most ethical would be fruitarian, but it requires so much food for every person to meet their daily caloric needs that it would be impossible to impose on everyone. Seriously, eating becomes a chore on this diet with how much has to be consumed. I also don't see a problem with harvesting animal products such as eggs, milk and honey so long as it's done ethically and sustainably. Eggs and milk would certainly help supplement calories and nutrients in a primarily fruit diet.
Replies: >>317239
>>317098
>Hey Ramjiv SukDeep, or whatever, did you know that Every single living thing on this planet eats something else?
>Even a carrot will gleefully feast upon your rotting corpse.
Eating corpse is different that raising animal in dark cages, prisons, then murdering them and extracting meat from their dead bodies.

>>317101
>Hope you know the only reason we don't eat people is because it easy to get sick from it.
We don't eat humans on large scale for different reasons.
I doubt you would get sick from eating human muscle meat.
>>317113
>NTA, but with the exception of socially maladapted, mentally ill people, Western Whites do NOT punish and torture their livestock.
1. They do. Keeping animals in such dark small cages and stuffing grains into them, this is torture.
2. White and jewish oligarchs and CEOs are torturing other humans.

>You ever see how predators from snakes all the way up to big cats and bears eat their prey?
>ALIVE. 
We have to stop them. Kill them.

>So spare me the bleeding heart bullshit and muh feels about how operating under our biological dietary imperatives is somehow bad.
It is bad. You have the option of being vegan or vegetarian. You don't use that option. Snakes do not have that option but you have.
You choose to torture and murder. You deserve the same happen to you.
Replies: >>317187
Pigs-caged.jpg
[Hide] (82.3KB, 900x600) Reverse
>>317113
>NTA, but with the exception of socially maladapted, mentally ill people, Western Whites do NOT punish and torture their livestock.
This (pic) is torture.
Replies: >>317183 >>317189
>>317181
they seem happy, all needs are satisfied
Replies: >>317259
>>317180
The horror.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymnLpQNyI6g
Replies: >>317188
>>317187
A pitcher plant would dissolve anything that falls inside ALIVE too.
>>317181
Pattern recognition engaged.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C107rGb7a4k
>>317114
>The only thing you can do is associate or not.
I don't associate with niggers. I could associate with high intellect and high morals humans.

>Strong men don't have to be gentle, altruistic, or empathetic, what makes them strong is their capacity to enforce their will, what they will is irrelevant.
Strong? Maybe in muscles. Like a aggressive nigger on steroids or with a gun.
But they don't have strong brains and minds.

>As far God goes, stop thinking your morally is anything but an evolving set of thinking patterns to help you and your group survive, and God has no need of it.
I don't want my group to get ahead, I want universal morals, where all beings are included, even aliens from other planets.
escher-impossible-shape-illusion-creative-still-life-photography-london-photographer-3.jpg
[Hide] (352.4KB, 750x975) Reverse
>>317195
You want this.
Replies: >>317315
>>317195
OK. Hypothetically, you encounter an alien that is an intelligent parasite  on some mindless organism (or worse, not mindless). Another possibility, a single-celled sentient alien. Yet another, a distributed intelligence like a nanobot cloud that perceives anything of different structure as resources. What would your morals say?
Replies: >>317315
>>317195
why are you so obsessed with niggers?
Replies: >>317315
8d3b2094cb8b9ea0c2d631d78ed5408d1f94a94aa9e9a47a8229bcd51f066eac.jpg
[Hide] (168.4KB, 976x1000) Reverse
The fact that anyone can even entertain such an idea is proof you have too much free time and not using it productively. It's the fact that we are apex predators of why anyone thinks of mercy for other animals. If you lived before the industrial revolution, you wouldn't even think twice about killing young animals for food.
Replies: >>317338
>>317153
>It follows then, that there is little difference between a complex network of living plants communicating via chemicals and energetic activations,(not even getting into Fungal networks,) and that of the symbiosis of human nervous system interactions.
There is huge difference. Animals have brains, eyes, emotions, they feel qualia.
When I cut broccoli with a knife, nothing happens, it doesn't cry or feel suffering.

>Also, HARM is a human conception borne of EGO and means nothing on a cosmic scale of the time that the "Big Picture"
Wrong. Consciousness is a feature of the universe and physics.
Replies: >>317224 >>317234
>>217214
>Consciousness is a feature of the universe and physics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignotum_per_ignotius
>>317220
>>317214
Replies: >>317225
>>317224
You can delete your posts. Any "Unregistered User" in board logs did that.
fear.png
[Hide] (26.1KB, 82x116) Reverse
a54abaf4419897f18bf851e587cccc1f.jpg
[Hide] (890KB, 1174x1668) Reverse
>>317195
>I don't want my group to get ahead
lel okay
>I want universal morals
already have it, it is energy transfer based around the strong taking from the weak, weather that be through stronger socialization, higher intelligence, or physical dominance
>even aliens from other planets.
lel, yea Im sure that will work out. I want to exterminate the ugly ones and make the cute ones sex pets
Sorry_boss,_I'l_do_better....JPG
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1777x1333) Reverse
Can't_INTO....JPG
[Hide] (726.6KB, 1488x1111) Reverse
>>317160
That may be, but I can't fathom how you could realistically ascertain that my post divulges anything about either my "desire for connection" or how (you) could possibly know anything about my judgement.

>>317214
>When I cut broccoli with a knife, nothing happens, it doesn't cry or feel suffering.
Neither would you feel the pain of the heat if your leg were cut off by cannibals and roasted over a fire.
Surely you can see that.
That (You)r human hardware can determine. That doesn't mean that cutting a live broccoli stalk doesn't react--indeed, it can be proven that it does, simply from the way plants have adapted to release chemicals to stop such attacks; nicotine, solanine, etc. 
But perhaps you misinterpret what I'm saying.
I am not advocating a should imperative here, but that taking life, any life, will cause a reaction to either attempt to preserve itself, or bemoan it's fate.
>Wrong. Consciousness is a feature of the universe and physics
This topic may beyond your scope.. try reading my statement again and you will see that your false equivalency of
>Human perception of HARM==Unconsciousness 
Are you saying that you can "read" the UV markings on flowers like insects? Or that you can give commands that are based off of fumaric acid compounds?
Of course you can't, but that doesn't negate the validity of those signals and communications of "alien"(I mean to humans and mammals, not Ayyylmaos,) operating systems.

An onion does indeed scream when you cut into it, but that won't stop me from eating them.
I will always eat cows, birds, pigs and other animals as well. But it's MY sense of connectedness to everything that causes me to try to reduce the suffering of those animals as much as possible.

>>317220
KEK!
Much more succinct than my ramble..
TY.
Replies: >>317358
>>317162
>I am not against treating animals with more dignity, but the reality is that life feeds on life.
This happens right now, but we have to stop this. You can start by stopping eating meat.

>You are no better for denying the same privileges to plants, which most certainly are feeling beings themselves. Some people believe even minerals are living as they do share some properties with what is traditionally identified as life. Shaping one's diet around the principle that suffering should be minimized is futile because you will always be consuming another being in order to sustain your own life, then.
Plants do not have brains and consciousness, animals have.

>Factory husbandry certainly is evil, but the underlying problem is there are too many "people" on the planet now. The global population should be reduced by a good 75% at least (starting with non-white regions of course). Quite a few problems are caused by human overpopulation, actually.
Okay, we can murder 6 billion humans.

>The diet I believe would be most ethical would be fruitarian, but it requires so much food for every person to meet their daily caloric needs that it would be impossible to impose on everyone. Seriously, eating becomes a chore on this diet with how much has to be consumed.
What about "fruits" like legumes and nuts, seeds?

>I also don't see a problem with harvesting animal products such as eggs, milk and honey so long as it's done ethically and sustainably. Eggs and milk would certainly help supplement calories and nutrients in a primarily fruit diet.
I don't think it is possible to do this ethically. If you know how then give some examples.
Replies: >>317241
>>317239
Maybe you could explain what pain is and where is the boundary between feeling it and not feeling it among different groups of lifeforms.
I'm posting cancer now called YT shorts, can't help it to find anything better. Would you see that as anything fundamentally different for some reason?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HhygmGLattg
Replies: >>317287
>>317183
>they seem happy, all needs are satisfied
They aren't, this is not their natural way of living, not what evolution wanted them to live.
They are in prison (cage) despite not doing anything.
>>317241
I can imagine tiny vibratory screams from the euglena the whole time:
>What NOOOOOOOOooo! FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK!! NOOO! I'm not goin' out like this.. FUUUUUUUCK!! FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU...I'm breaking OOOOOOUT!! FUCK YOOOOOU!!

kek.
https://youtu.be/7lzhvjDveCE
Humans are divine beings.
But niggers, pajeets, kikes, sandniggers, brown "people" and so on are animals yes.
Replies: >>317301
GondolaMoth.jpg
[Hide] (126.4KB, 888x821) Reverse
>>317299
DIGGITS1 ;XDDD!
Replies: >>317371
>>317196
>You want this.
No, what I want is possible, just elect me as a dictator.

>>317201
>Hypothetically, you encounter an alien that is an intelligent parasite  on some mindless organism (or worse, not mindless). Another possibility, a single-celled sentient alien. Yet another, a distributed intelligence like a nanobot cloud that perceives anything of different structure as resources. What would your morals say?
Nothing, unless there is harm or suffering there, then we have to act.

>>317206
>why are you so obsessed with niggers?
I am from /pol/
Replies: >>317320
>>317315
And now we long for a little rest but find it not:
We follow hard upon and obtain (it) not:
And light has vanished from before us,
And darkness is our dwelling-place for ever and ever:

For we have not believed before Him
Nor glorified the name of the Lord of Spirits, [nor glorified our Lord]
But our hope was in the sceptre of our kingdom,
And in our glory.

And in the day of our suffering and tribulation He saves us not,
And we find no respite for confession
That our Lord is true in all His works, and in His judgements and His justice,
And His judgements have no respect of persons.
And we pass away from before His face on account of our works,
And all our sins are reckoned up in righteousness.'
Replies: >>317332
cwc_s_sonichu_comic_book_8_4_by_cwcipedia_d27t3mi-pre-1674508388.jpg
[Hide] (319.6KB, 789x1013) Reverse
>>317320
Replies: >>317333
>>317332
gave me a mild chuckle
>>317153
>3rd pic
Spoiler that orgy next time.
Replies: >>317528
>>317209
>The fact that anyone can even entertain such an idea is proof you have too much free time and not using it productively.
Yeah goy, don't think too much, just work in a factory like a chink and consume slop.
>It's the fact that we are apex predators of why anyone thinks of mercy for other animals. If you lived before the industrial revolution, you wouldn't even think twice about killing young animals for food.
I don't live before industrial revolution.
Now we all have option to be vegan. It's easy and cheap.
If you still pick meat, you are a monster.
Replies: >>317339
>>317338
Still no demonstration why only animals can suffer.
Replies: >>317429
>>317220
If consciousness is not from physics, then where from? God?

>>317234
>That (You)r human hardware can determine. That doesn't mean that cutting a live broccoli stalk doesn't react--indeed, it can be proven that it does, simply from the way plants have adapted to release chemicals to stop such attacks; nicotine, solanine, etc. 
Do you have any evidence that plants feel suffering and consciousness like animals?
If they have chemicals to stop eating them, this doesn't prove anything. It's simple evolution and randomness, it is not a conscious decision of the plant to release the chemical.
>I am not advocating a should imperative here, but that taking life, any life, will cause a reaction to either attempt to preserve itself, or bemoan it's fate.
The evolution doesn't want someone to eat the plant. But the plant itself doesn't have mind and consciousness, doesn't feel anything.
>An onion does indeed scream when you cut into it, but that won't stop me from eating them.
It doesn't.
>I will always eat cows, birds, pigs and other animals as well. But it's MY sense of connectedness to everything that causes me to try to reduce the suffering of those animals as much as possible.
You are eating yourself, it another dimension, you are cannibal or actually self-cannibal.
If you had sense of connectedness you wouldn't eat animals.
Replies: >>317359 >>317530
>>317358
Clear dictator material.
Replies: >>318357
>>317301
:DDDDDDDDDDDD
>>317339
>Still no demonstration why only animals can suffer.
Still no evidence plants can suffer.
Replies: >>317434
>>317429
How do you understand suffering then? As a reaction specific to damaged/diminished bodily integrity is not enough, I guess. What about that euglena in my post above? Or do you need screams and visible trashing about to be convinced?
Replies: >>317473 >>317582
>>317434
for jews it's called tumah. it builds up in the body and damages the body. exposure to death, blood, gore, harsh language, etc.
Replies: >>317474 >>317522
>>317473
Something metaphysical? Making stuff up is easy. Easy to be addicted to, metaphorically.
Replies: >>317476
>>317474
cont.
I'd expect bandwagoning there second-hand embarrassment too.
im not a statist or anything but eating animals is pretty selfish all things considered.
>>317473
So could I program a bot that send a message daily to jews with a gore pic and/or simply saying "Kill yourself filthy nigger kike" and with tsome time the tumah would kill them?
>>317337
kek1!
Sorry..wilco.
Venusian_Wonders_of_the_flesh.gif
[Hide] (1.9MB, 450x253) Reverse
>>317358
>Do you have any evidence that plants feel suffering and consciousness like animals?
No.
But is the ANIMALIA way of "Pain" translatable to the Flora "Sense of pain"?
Watareya? An Familyist?
All_your_IZZAT.jpg
[Hide] (191.7KB, 600x403) Reverse
Also..
What makes (you) the arbiter of what counts as "FEELS"
https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/plants-have-feelings-too
Again... I am an OMNIVORE, and as such I eat most everything living...*(Not at the time however,) and are you really suggesting that predators, even down to Amoebas, are disconnected to the world around them?
Surely not.
post hand because you seem like that faggot jeet that was shitting up several other smolChans with this kind of Vegan Pablum.
You first, with timestamp and boardname, then I will as well.
**No self-Dox, blur those fingerpads.
Lemme guess...you won't.
c0d10a66992750a291dc2ec6196061c7a50a49c1cb6213b7e16b6deeffa2d072.jpg
[Hide] (8.1KB, 184x184) Reverse
I've been on the carnivore diet for the last 2 years and would like to see you try to stop me from eating animals, lol. I would break you like a twig if you came at me
eating animals is good
eating humans is bad
It's all about economics you imbeciles.
If the most economic value gained from a human was meat, then we would be eating humans.
The reason we eat animals is because that's the highest economic value we can gain from them.
>>317551
Wouldn't that make any carnivores economy experts?
Replies: >>317569
>>317568
your mother is a whore, but that doesn't make her a sexologist
Replies: >>317575
>>317569
An analogy doesn't go that far as equivalence. Try again fixing square cross-section pegs into triangular cross-section holes. Both have cross-sections, after all.
Replies: >>317576 >>317657
>>317575
Military camouflage versus biological camouflage, etc.
Replies: >>317578
>>317576
What would be the human equivalent to moths' fluff for example? It hides them from bats' echolocation, apparently, by dispersing the echoes.
Replies: >>317580 >>317585
>>317578
Keeping it to biology, the name flagellum can describe two different blueprints, one with a helical movement that pushes water (or other fluids) back, similar to ship's propelling screw, the other moving in a single plane to and fro, like whip's movement being repeated again and again instead. The word is the same, the content not exactly.
>>317434
>How do you understand suffering then?
In consciousness, mind, like you human feel.
>As a reaction specific to damaged/diminished bodily integrity is not enough, I guess.
It is not enough. The reaction can be just programmed but it doesn't mean there is any feeling and suffering. Robots can be programmed to do something when you hit them, doesn't mean they feel suffering.
>What about that euglena in my post above?
What is euglena?
Replies: >>317583
>>317582
>What is euglena?
Neither a plant nor animal.
>>317578
Not exactly the same, lol. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghillie_suit
I'd say that's still similar enough to help explaining one with the other, or vice versa. Like with my post >>317065 here. Or I might get proven wrong, who knows.
>>317057
>Plant eating animals like deer are not eating meat and not eating you
>he doesn't know
https://inv.thepixora.com/watch?v=9xDPrvhLNuU
Here's a well-educated nigger that explains in a way a retard like you could understand why they eat meat.
Replies: >>317629
>>317625
You can also throw this query into YT: "cat eating grass" for lots of recorded results that linked negro didn't feel worth mentioning when he called cats obligate carnivores. Hard rules, lol. They can't survive without meat, but apparently just meat's not the whole story.
Replies: >>317646
humans can do whatever because they hold power
Replies: >>317647
KornKot2.jpg
[Hide] (125.1KB, 1280x720) Reverse
>>317629
My kots eat grass...
But only as a precursor to vomiting up whatever they feel the need to void from their stomachs.
A Kot cannot digest grass anymore than you could, as neither has a rumen equipped with the gut flora to do so. Just as you could not rightly be called a petravore just because your seasonings might contain silicon dioxide,(pulverized sand essentially,) neither can a kot be considered an omnivore by any stretch of the imagination.
>picrel is funny because it's aberrant
Replies: >>317650
>>317642
Sort of an inter-animalia Force Doctrine, huh?
Makes sense.
>>317646
Any food is not only its energy-bearing compounds. And eating grass just to force vomiting is not a reason good enough. Hint, hint, catnip and silver vine. A cat can't metabolize starch, but that doesn't mean that any bioactive compound contained by grass can't be absorbed as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWqQbGh13iI
Replies: >>317651
Turnkeys.JPG
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1800x1350) Reverse
>>317650
Totally agree.
But then where does that place Inhaled plant based intoxicants?
There are probably instances of that in nature.
What about transdermally absorbed ones?
Those Japanese monkeys that use hotsprings might very well do similar to humans when they discover lithium springs.
these are only meant as further examples of "NOT-Food" but still utilized as bio-actives.
Replies: >>317658
people die every day. and for what? nothing
plane crash, train wreck...
bosnia? pick your tragedy
sniper in a restaurant, fifteen dead, story at eleven, what do we do?
>>317575
the analogy makes perfect sense
you just can't handle the fact your mom's a whore
Replies: >>317661
>>317651
I recall owls don't eat anything special when they want to force back feather clumps cluttering their stomachs as a remnant from their prey. And humans can also barf by themselves well enough if something in their meal disagrees with them. Why would cats be different in that regard?
Replies: >>317660 >>317692
>>317658
*feather/hair
>>317657
You shouldn't judge anons by your own measure.
Replies: >>317663
>>317551
We enjoy meat because of biology.
>>317661
lmao get a better comeback
Replies: >>317842
>>317551
>It's all about economics you imbeciles.
>If the most economic value gained from a human was meat, then we would be eating humans.
>The reason we eat animals is because that's the highest economic value we can gain from them.
Capitalists should be massacred.
Replies: >>317681 >>317694
>>317551
It takes far more land to feed a human if they eat a high meat diet vs a low meat one. Eating meat harms the economy. The reason we eat animals is because we are out of control, if not then we'd not simultanenously believe in le animal abuse and also at the same time enslave our animals like we did with horses. 
>>317679
There is something very greedy about his logic. HIghest value, it's not even... it's like when people used to bitch about people getting steaks with their EBT food assistance cards because on the first of the month all the good steaks go missing and the richie has to wait. Like, why do you care that much about steak when a slim jim is right there? So pretentious.
Replies: >>317696
>>317070
Nigger lover detected.
Warm_Day_Thoughts_on_Arctic_nights.JPG
[Hide] (797.9KB, 1488x1111) Reverse
IMG_0810.JPG
[Hide] (1MB, 1600x1200) Reverse
>>317658
>Why would cats be different in that regard?
Having forced puking myself on a few occasions,(I KNOW that "X" was off, or "Too much alcohol, if I don't get it out NAO <<HIC!>> I'll be in a world of hurt"
Difference is, I had to stick my finger down my throat and hit my Uvular gag reflex.
Cat's can't do that. But mine have also just thrown up without eating grass too, so I'm not sure what the true mechanism is. No one truly is, but there are theories:
https://www.petmd.com/cat/general-health/why-do-cats-eat-grass

Owls produce pellets by their digestive design. I'd assume that since they use a crop rather than teeth, and are egg layers, the mechanisms are very different.
My girls have caught, killed, and eaten many rabbit pups, moles and mice. they usually just crunch the whole thing up, but I have seen one of them seemingly make a deal with the corvids to chase away "Romeo the Rapist", an old tom that used to harass them.
I was amazed to see a small murder of 4 just harassing the shit out of him whil my gal sat on a fencepost watching.
>>317679
>massacred
replaced with what?
Replies: >>317697
IMG_1124.JPG
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1111x833) Reverse
SUGAR_translation.jpg
[Hide] (187.9KB, 1280x720) Reverse
>>317681
>It takes far more land to feed a human if they eat a high meat diet
This isn't even really true.
IF we were still herbivores" we would be eating a much higher volume of food mass than a more natural carnivorous diet requires.
Much of human eating habits are heavily manipulated by advertising these days. When I went on a true Keto diet for a couple months to reverse my skinnyfat fatty liver,(I caught myself edging towards preT2D quite on accident by playfully testing my BG levels on someone else's meter, and found I was becoming insulin resistant,) The VOLUME of food I needed was so reduced that my grocery bill was 1/4 of what it was with a mixed diet.
I don't eat goyslop anyway but my satiety levels from a modest amount of meat, lots of fat like butter, and cruciferous vegetables were HIGH.
I didn't finish a plate in one sitting most of the time.
my point is, In a more natural diet, 10 lbs of grass fed beef or bug and grain fed chicken will last a LOT longer and have more food value than 100 lbs of beans and rice and other vegetarian staples.
look at how much lowland gorrillas have to eat daily, just to maintain their health. now imagine 100 of them. You can see why early humans were so nomadic until they started animal husbandry and cultivating vegetables in place instead of being seasonal nomads.
lysenko.jpg
[Hide] (167.3KB, 960x500) Reverse
>>317694
I think to be fair, that first anon wasn't talking about economy in a currency sense, but in the biological.
The economics of survival would be a good example.
the Commie anon calling for mass-a-cree!! just isn't as smart as they think they are.
" Say, didn't millions of COMMIES STARVE?? "
Replies: >>317840 >>318063
I'm ok with eating humans. Most of history people ate parts of humans.
Replies: >>317780
Shelling_a_human.jpg
[Hide] (468.7KB, 1000x1545) Reverse
LONGPIGCUTS.jpg
[Hide] (63.3KB, 500x741) Reverse
>>317776
Here, you might want this in the upcoming months...
>pic(s)
eating other humans is inherently Nigger-Tier, unless in an emergency like with the Donner party or that soccer team where there were no alternatives.
Replies: >>317783
1752964672449244.webm
[Hide] (3.9MB, 480x700, 00:14)
>>317780
I don't see why. Lots of things that are "nigger-tier" are just preindustrial and I have more fondness of ancient non-niggers than I do for the current ones.
It's a shame to let humans be eaten by insects.
Replies: >>317785 >>317802
>>317783
like mad cow disease, just concentrate prions over generations in a feedbackloop, it probably wont affect you if you already have a sponge for a brain
Replies: >>317787
>>317785
Mad cow disease is not caused by cannibalism, neither is kuru. Mad cow disease was transmitted from sheep to cows.
Replies: >>317788 >>317797
>>317787
thats why they made the practice of reintroducing cadavers into feed illegal after the outbreak, literal sponge for a brain
>>317787
misinformation, on my misinformation website?
Replies: >>317808
>>317783
>It's a shame to let humans be eaten by insects.
It is not.
That is the natural order of things. 
>    Hamlet. A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm. 

>    Claudius. What dost thou mean by this?

>    Hamlet. Nothing but to show you how a king may go a progress through the guts of a beggar. 

Round and round we go.
Replies: >>317808
>>317797
It's not retard.
>>317802
Shakespeare was a nigger lover. Warriors get picked up by Valkyries, others got cremated by the norse.
Replies: >>317841
>>317697
That would be similar, wouldn't it?
>economy relates to ecology
>astrology relates to astronomy
<it shows right in their names! (even if suffixes are switched there)
Lazy thinking to leave it like this.
Replies: >>318002
>>317808
Carrion birds were disappointed, then.
Replies: >>317983
>>317663
It's popular because it's often true, not the other way round.
>>317841
so it seems...so it seems.
https://youtu.be/R0ltJVI_NiI
>>317840
Economy is expressing all human endeavor through flow of currency. What does it say about barter or trading gifts for future favor or some other money-less interactions? Humans need money to thrive now, but answering the question what humans would need in order to thrive as "money" is undeniably lacking. Economy is older than ecology and is also more limited than ecology in its scope of interest, similar to astrology and astronomy. Different questions as issues central to them, same as different assumptions made to simplify the subject matter. Using economy to generalize to all living organisms would be like asking an astrologer about what is a galaxy. Maybe fun, but missing the point.
Replies: >>318013
>>318002
It's funny when an actual economist raises the issue of framing the question in order to influence the answer favorably. I guess this problem is not limited to economy, lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law
Replies: >>318015
>>318013
Human psychology, huh.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogation
Unclear demands might produce a "Catch-22" situation instead. The vagaries of human condition, lol.
for all you niggers under a rock
there is a duplicate thread (few hours earlier) on lainchan
https://lainchan.org/hum/res/97755.html
Replies: >>318026 >>318034
>>318023
Us wignats and neetsocs really keep falling for the dumbest psyops dont we? Maybe epstein and the kikes were right, we do deserve our enslavement.
Replies: >>318029 >>318082
>>318026
>us
Chug bleach, kike
>>318023
Why only paid shills would make duplicate threads in two different slow imageboards concurrently? It's not like you can't frequent both. And copying arguments from one and posting them in the other to play devil's advocate is a rather dumb and efficient way of having fun at someone's expense.
Replies: >>318042
9924f421ad8571e9bb81018520914736f6acbe6ebd19045d8c5666d34ec5889c.png
[Hide] (832.2KB, 2597x1948) Reverse
Coping shill >>318034
Replies: >>318043
>>318042
Never posted on lainchan, personally. But whatever floats your boat.
Replies: >>318046
23b3b0b13743292eca16d3101c760ff60dbb9aaa927da7e28c79f86cb52ffcb1.jpg
[Hide] (54KB, 736x736) Reverse
>>318043
How did it feel not being able to subvert boards when this site was down? Mr.shillman.
Replies: >>318051
>>318046
If I were your personal delusion, I would have enough alternative sites to post on, wouldn't I? I was reading fiction and doing boring irl things, as I do most the time anyway. Can you post anything better than a throwaway shitpost?
>>317697
>pic can actually happen
>perpetual snowball earth scenario incoming
Fun as fiction only, but self-contradictory otherwise.
Not_Wecome.jpg
[Hide] (36.5KB, 640x360) Reverse
>>318026
>Us wignats and neetsocs
huh...
Replies: >>318084
>>318082
I think he is talking about the fact that left wing organizations pay violence promoting right wing groups so they can keep going and the left wing groups can use that to justify being paid to be the moral authority
I think, but not sure.
Replies: >>318086
SPLC_funded_Spic_Fuentes-NA-UTR-and_others.jpg
[Hide] (135.4KB, 936x1024) Reverse
SPLC_funded_Spic_Fuentes-NA-UTR-and_others--2--.jpg
[Hide] (100KB, 956x1024) Reverse
>>318084
Why... I have *Just* the picas for this...
>pics verr relate
Replies: >>318089
>*PICS
polite Sahhh-Gayyy
donald-annoyed.gif
[Hide] (1.1MB, 498x372) Reverse
>>318086
This should not be surprising
Liberals are bad people, that literally have an innate morally that tells them to do whatever it takes to gain money and power.
Replies: >>318093
Pieter_Bruegel_The_Misanthrope.jpg
[Hide] (385.5KB, 2536x2505) Reverse
FUCK_KIKES!!.jpg
[Hide] (64.8KB, 666x666) Reverse
>>318089
>This should not be surprising
Oh, It's NOT.
I am indeed what Kant would call a Negative Misanthrope in that I truly hate much of what humanity sees as "just how things are.." but I also think that at some point, the 80% of followers, sheep, whatever.. can be led by GOOD example, just as much as they can by BAD.

I was testing this earlier today by "sheepdogging" retards on the highway.
>Using turn signals correctly
>Maintaining 1 carlength per 10/MPH
>Left lane for passing only; quickly getting over after passing a vehicle that has miles of space in front of them
>Laughing at the sheep who clump up together and suck up the stress all while staying back behind the scrum
>Pointing at retards tailgating or riding the passing lane

Funny thing, when most people actually understand that other people are seeing what bullshit they are doing, they fall into line faster than morans at a VAXX-line for donuts.
The only really frustrating thing about this is that the "Herd" swaps out about every ten miles and you have to "Train" them all over again.
Had some fun, but I did yell Nigger!! several times.
>I don't want my group to get ahead
>No, what I want is possible, just elect me as a dictator.
>>317359
Would plants elect him?
>>317125
>life is as life does
Google artificial stupidity interprets that in a funny way. I guess getting philosophical can confuse it easily.
Replies: >>318977
Any people here that became vegan after reading this thread?
Replies: >>318786
KookaburaRave.webm
[Hide] (1.2MB, 384x480, 00:35)
YeeeeeeeHAWWW!!!.jpg
[Hide] (204.8KB, 572x365) Reverse
>>318769
[X]
I think there has to be a certain amount of irrational altruism for people to change their diet like that from just a few youtub videos or some ASPCA adverts.

I'm not saying that vegetarianism is a bad choice, indeed, some phenotypes thrive from a vegetarian diet, but when it becomes an Social Identifier for a person, then it's usually only because they want to virtue signal.

Nothing wrong with being a vegetarian, nothing wrong with being a respectful omnivore or carnivore. 
Seeing the videos out of China of animal abuse, or the rare factory farm abuse here in the West just make me want to make the perpetrator of that abuse endure it themselves.
I love animals, most all of them, but while I'd never wish to see an animal suffer intentionally, I won't hesitate to eat meat that I know has been responsibly raised and killed, nor would I hesitate to dispatch an animal that is suffering and can't be helped.

For those that don't know; Those ASCPA adverts you see on the TeeVee, are really scamming you. They make it SEEM like they are saving the starving little puppies and kittens, but in reality, they kill most of the animals they "Save".
Think about that the next time you see one of those T-shirts walking around in public.

TL;DR: No. We are too removed from our food supply, and perhaps it would be a good thing if people who eat meat had to at least watch it be killed. Veganism is political/social and detrimental to the human body.
CAUTION
Video too loud may cause EAR-RAEP
>>318564
"Dictionary meaning of endeavor" resulted in some garbled table of numbers, lol.
Stop meat.
1590778463549.gif
[Hide] (511.8KB, 220x256) Reverse
return to your genes

https://youtu.be/CmJYZ1NIn1Y
human = animal
Replies: >>319961
>>319918
Yes...but there is the issue of the pre-frontal cortex and future time orientation.
When you can show me dolphins or whatever that have a Time-binding semantic circuit like written language, then I'll acquiesce
Replies: >>319982
>>319961
>arbitrary nonsense
number 1 jigglyillion +1
Replies: >>319997
How_to_use_your_own_brain_for_fun_and_Profit.jpg
[Hide] (215.7KB, 396x630) Reverse
>>319982
But it's not...
Replies: >>320097
>>319997
This has little mass-appeal, enough to be rather ignored by those dismissive already, compared to works of people like Robert Heinlein who despite carrying no echoes around his name had successfully imitated their usual methods of attaining commercial success. If something doesn't tickle the base drives enough while ignoring their logical consequences, it will be dismissed. I can't stop being surprised by someone with those echoes who breaks through despite ignoring the same techniques.
Replies: >>320164
Cut_me_some_SLACK!!.JPG
[Hide] (680.2KB, 1808x1356) Reverse
1637351306940.gif
[Hide] (1011.5KB, 500x655) Reverse
>>320097
Well, Wilson wasn't ((())) but You do have a point.(He was an asset)
Would it surprise you to know that Terrence KeKenna, RAW and  The key founder of CAW,(Church of all Worlds-based off of  'Stranger in a Strange Land' ,) Oberon Zell-Ravenheart, all attended the same festivals with ACE, albeit different ones.
I've met 2 of the 3, RAW being the one I missed on account of him attending a WinterStar gathering, which I didn't go to)

Lemme tell ya... PLENTY of base drivess going on there.
There was quite a showing of SubGeniiiiaiaiaiaia, as well. I have an autographed copy of  'The Book of the Church of the Subgenius®'  -Ivan Stang.
Definitely also an asset. but he did have good imports from Columbia.
Yes, Coca teabags are a thing...and I don't even like coke.
Replies: >>320171 >>320208
>>320164
That last sentence in the post above wasn't about Wilson, but about someone else who was my favorite source of weird ideas to bounce in my head. Someone suspected by Philip K. Dick to be a cover for some eastern bloc propaganda committee.
>>320164
>He was an asset
I've read a bit about Kekenna, kek, having had some dubious patrons and those speculating that anyone who might have ever set foot on the property of the Esalen Institute being suspect, but what's this about Wilson and Stang being assets?
Replies: >>320230
Aminom_Eris_Omniquery's_Folly.jpg
[Hide] (1.4MB, 3264x2448) Reverse
Subgenius_pamplets.jpg
[Hide] (981.6KB, 2880x2939) Reverse
>>320208
Wilson worked closely with Leary on things such as  'Neuropolitique' 
And KeKenna was a fucking dirty old Ketamine junkie. All he did at festival was nodd off or skeeze on the pretty pagan bints.

Stang may not have directly been an asset, but he certainly would've been heavily monitored. IDK about some of the others, Like Pastor Buck Naked, or Reverend Kekhaver,(That was Mark Mothersbaugh I think...)
ANY fringe org that has the kind of goofballs,(like me,) that find this shit hilarious, will also have semi-sane and volatile "members"
I'm pretty sure the Discordians can be thrown in the mix as well, even though I also have an earlier printing of the Pricipia Discordia,(Obnoxious pink cover)
Here's the receipts on Leary and co.
https://youtu.be/EFS1ZyizFk8
Replies: >>320236
d1a9b2bb6169166fe0f9263ae636bfcc1bdf7bdc71dfc474e78528f18c38e88c.png
[Hide] (576.2KB, 516x676) Reverse
>>320230 (lol, those digits)
As far as Leary is concerned, that much should be obvious, but to say that Wilson was a controlled asset or that his other work was compromised in some way simply for collaborating with Leary on that project seems to be a stretch. Strange bedfellows in that era for sure, but I tend to entertain a view that goes something like this. Some likely spook invites you to a private dinner party and you're aware that they are likely a spook, what do? Refuse the invitation on those grounds? Or accept the invitation, well aware of what the situation might be, as there is no other way of knowing what gets said around the diner table unless you take a seat? I think many in that situation would choose the latter of the two options, as there is more utility in being a fly on the wall than not, which of course then muddies the waters in the guilt by association game.
>KeKenna was a fucking dirty old Ketamine junkie
Really? I thought he was the mushroom man turned DMT evangelist? Never heard him give any sermons regarding ketamine. The only semi-prominent goofball I've read about from that scene that could be called a dirty old ketamine junkie was John C. Lilly.
>Stang may not have directly been an asset, but he certainly would've been heavily monitored
No doubt, at the very least by the IRS for his unrepentant grifting.
>I'm pretty sure the Discordians can be thrown in the mix as well
I don't know. Ask 5 Popes, get 23 different answers.
>Here's the receipts on Leary and co.
Too long, haven't watched... yet. Thanks for the link.
Replies: >>320259
ER15VVuV5u.jpg
[Hide] (178.5KB, 640x675) Reverse
1589603057496.jpg
[Hide] (24.9KB, 320x320) Reverse
Golden_Apples_Slot_machine.jpg
[Hide] (331KB, 1280x720) Reverse
>>320236
>Some likely spook invites you to a private dinner party and you're aware that they are likely a spook, what do? Refuse the invitation on those grounds?
That's fair.
Regardless if he was an asset or not, I still like most of his books.
>Really?
Yep. saw it myself, ''without *much* chemical augmentation. (well, it was an impromptu bar, so..)

>I don't know. Ask 5 Popes, get 23 different answers.
KEK!

RAW also wrote the forward to one of the later printings of the  'Principia' 
Even later printings had forwards that were even longer that the original book itself.
i'm guessing that's intentional.

Funny story:
once when I was planning to take a "Hail Mary" trip out west, I was strapped for funds and thought, 
>" huh.. I've never been to a casino. maybe the local wallet skinner can provide a couple hundred bucks more "
Usually a horrible idea, but I was oddly fixated on it.
I wandered around inside for at least an hour with my paltry $100 to spend and no more, when I happened upon a slot machine called Golden Apples, after putting in only about $23 dollars, I won a jackpot of almost $600.
I just left immediately after cashing out. 
It funded a much more comfortable trip for me, and I was sure to have at least a couple bunless hotdogs on a couple Fridays,(campfire snackrifice)
[New Reply]
174 replies | 58 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3