/b/ - Random

It makes sense when you realize that white people aren't a single group and only appear cohesive when compared with shitskins. Your map is filled with groups that have their own genes, ethnicity, culture, language, politics, and beliefs. The outcomes of European wars in the past has led us to the current status quo where Europe is being invaded.

>>244434 (OP) 
<Dey hab huwyte skeen y dey fite doe?
Muttmerican lol

>>244434 (OP) 
it makes perfect sense if you view it in the context that these wars were mass offerings, considering ((( Bankers ))) were funding both sides in ww1 and ww2, responsible for the french and Russian revolutions, and are now currently trying to maximize ukraine's casualty rate by funding a war they have no hopes of winning

>>244436
>t. jew

c0ea808764666b8a38d1d2a1fa34e7838213c23b637bfef7bc02b72eb0311214.jpg
[Hide] (81.8KB, 683x1024) Reverse

>>244436
>It makes sense when you realize that white people aren't a single group and only appear cohesive when compared with shitskins.
If only an equivalent of a Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court could have explained something as seemingly mundane as the concept of frequent flier miles to past generations. Even Americans in the 1960s, with all of their domestic nigger problems, would have had trouble imagining getting Zerg rushed through international airport terminals. Wetbacks flying business class. Shitskins just flew over my house!

>>244436
>The outcomes of European wars in the past has led us to the current status quo where Europe is being invaded.
That's what I'm saying.

>>244450
It would have been one thing if this led to the expansion of one ethnos or another. But it didn't. The monarchs in charge, while seemingly badass in a shallow sort of war, were totally directionless with no long term strategy beyond immediate personal aggrandizement. And their successors sold out their countries to jews. Hell, they were doing this at the time as well.

Test

>>244434 (OP) 
This map is the reason people say none of the countries past Germany matter since they are literally younger than United States of America, a fake and manufactured nation itself, yet is older
For comparison, it's like imagine you took opinion of zoomer seriously?

>>249292
There is a serious difference between a flag worshiper like yourself and a nationalist.
Flag worshipers see lines on a map and think that is nationalism.
Real nationalists understand that nationalism is about people, communities, families. 
Slovakians have existed in Slovakia since before France existed. That's far more meaningful than your lines on a map.
Furthermore, the ONLY major country I don't see on this map IS Germany.

>>244516
Religious wars are a serious business. 7 years? Pah. Try 30.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years%27_War
The history of Europe is full of blood and strife. Any country in it was at odds with all its neighbors. It's normal.

happy_ironically.jpg
[Hide] (39.8KB, 735x558) Reverse

>>249361
You're so smart. I definitely was just confusing symbols on a map with cultures.

>>253275
This is true. Yet all the same, every single man who died for his religion in the 30 years war died for nothing because Germany is atheist now and Germans are slated for extinction. Yet no one fights back.
We're so eager to kill each other over sport games and religion, yet unwilling to kill our enemies even as they openly state that they will never stop until we are racially cleansed from the earth.

>>253275
Life is war

Hohenfriedeberg_-_Attack_of_Prussian_Infantry_-_1745.jpg
[Hide] (533.4KB, 1019x713) Reverse

>>244434 (OP) 
These men were in spiritual ecstasy dying for their kings who were appointed by God and from whom the legitimacy of their country was derived.

>>253291
Maybe it's because that they thought that being victorious makes them factually right? The spiritual legacy of this custom:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_by_combat
Current passivity is called learned helplessness, I guess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learned_helplessness

So you have just discovered last year that war is a racket and it is even worse in a aristrocracy? What's next? Getting puzzled over the fact that medieval kings had tremendous problems with putting together an army, because most people saw their wars as a private matter rather than a collective?

>>244516
You sound like period accurate kike crank. 

>>253275
Don't forget the dead sea scrolls sized catalog of crusades against heretical groups and Second Reich and Byzantium pushing heretics into each other for centuries. 

>>253291
So did anyone who followed Scipio Africanus, Hannibal or Alexander the great by your definition, because Northern Africa isn't Roman anymore, Carthage is gone and the middle east hasn't been under Greek since the guy croaked.

>>253357
I'd say yes because Rome eventually converted to a religion that degraded the men who bled and died for Rome in the Punic Wars. Then again, even they could rest soundly knowing that their nation died an honorable death fighting for its existence, albeit with some cucking.

>>253357
History is full of irony. One notable example is Austria partitioning Poland not even 100 years after this event:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Vienna
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitions_of_Poland
Politics is filthy and always was.

>>253363
Ancient Rome was interesting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Roman_emperors_murdered_by_the_Praetorian_Guard
The cause of Aurelian's death was especially amusing.
>A secretary of his (called Eros by Zosimus) had told a lie on a minor issue. In fear of what the emperor might do, he forged a document listing the names of high officials marked by the emperor for execution and showed it to collaborators. The notarius Mucapor and other high-ranking officers of the Praetorian Guard, fearing punishment from the emperor, murdered him shortly after October 275 (Tacitus began his reign in November or December), in Caenophrurium, Thrace.[63][35]
I'd call that being trolled to death.

hrrfahne_by_arminius1871-d7xt7ly.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1500x900) Reverse

>>253363
That's not exactly how it worked. After Constantine the great adopted Christianity and won the Imperial throne, he moved the capital to a fishing village at the Bosporus called Byzantion where the center of the Roman nation will reside until the Renaissance. The Western Roman empire simply fell apart and got into Frankish hands in the late antiquity. Northern Africa got conquered by Islamic armies pouring out of Arabia before even the Carolingians where a thing. The religion the Romans practiced at the time was pretty much irrelevant for the loss of that region.

>>253365
Or how Theophanu had to give William the brawler his lands back to keep the Reich together. There was a crapton more, because the 1st Reich was a federation of principalities, duchies and city state the German Emperor hardly controlled. At the time of its dissolution that was enacted to deny Napoleon the Imperial throne, it was so irrelevant, that even Goethe didn't give a shit about that.

>>253363
Calling Rome a single nation is quite presumptuous. That patchwork of provinces kept together by threat of violence was more like a collective of colonies for the Roman city-state. Feel free to debunk what is wrong with this post.

>>253378
Emperor Caracalla. Was Emperor  from 211 until his dead in 217. He expanded to Roman citizenship to all free men in the empire with the exception of the subjugated. The reasons are pretty unclear honestly. The one many historians stick with the one Caracalla himself gave in his writings: To have more Romans who can pray to the Gods for protection of the Emperor. 

Partly as second order effect of that policy, most people in South Eastern Europe saw themselves as Romans.

>>253379
What percentage of "Romans" was fluent in Latin?

>>253380
No idea. Not many of the new citizens I suppose, because they spoke mostly Koine Greek, which was the language the roman upper classes at the time spoke at home.

>>253384
Were Imperial edicts also recorded mostly in Koine Greek?

82664e105e8caca94f2df755a16d177c0e9622ab282b96fd38ecd9b7b066b850.jpg
[Hide] (114.4KB, 736x559) Reverse

>>253385
Koine Greek and Latin and that's a crapshoot. I am saying this,  because I suspect that you are probably trying to lure me into a trap to BTFO me. Doesn't work that well when medieval Rome is the subject of discussion. It inevitably will be, because Caracallas' policy was part of its ethnogenesis.

>>253387
I'm trying to guess what is your definition of a nation. Rome was a nation because its people believed it was, right? As far from ethnocentrism as possible, I would say. A state and a nation are not the same, but what do I know?

>>253388
For example, are citizens of current Romania eligible to claim that their identity goes back to Rome? It's difficult to think when the concepts you think with are too nebulous, so this degree of hair splitting is justified, I guess.

>>253388
Rome was considered a Nation in the Ancient sense: You picked a Polis or some city on the hill and became a citizen through various processes. And you were fully subject of the city with all the rights and freedoms and duties that came with it. If this sounds totalitarian to you, it is because it was. Wasn't problem in ancient Greece though, because you could simply switch your polis if things didn't work out. 

Keep in mind that Christianity had just been adopted like a quarter year ago when the Ethnogenesis of Eastern Rome started in earnest and the problem of the one of the many hadn't gotten much attention yet. Hell, Christian Bishops at time didn't even know which papyrus scroll was part of the bible and which one wasn't or got an consensus what Christians believed. Why do I bring that up? Because Christian thinkers (after they decided that Theology is definitely a discipline of Greek Philosophy) solved the Problem of the one and the many by postulating a balance between the two, because there is one in the Trinity. Before that, all you got totalitarian overblown focus on the many.

> For example, are citizens of current Romania eligible to claim that their identity goes back to Rome?
Yo, I suppose. On the one hand the naming and some of the heritage goes back to the Eastern Roman Empire. And I have no idea if it was part of the Roman Empire when Caracalla got his ebin idea. Bulgaria on the other hand definitely not. The Bulgurs made their own Empire which was a major rival of Rome in the region.

>>253393
Apparently they were incorporated already:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacia

>>253393
>you could simply switch your polis if things didn't work out
Or you could get kicked out by the majority vote, lol.
What condition would be sufficient for someone to lose his citizenship now, I wonder? Even dual citizenship is not enough lately.

Romanians are saars, not European.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (125.9KB, 1218x888) Reverse

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (873.1KB, 1920x1080) Reverse

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (917.9KB, 1920x1080) Reverse

>>253396
Interesting. I haven't remembered the reach of the Roman empire going that far up north. Here's a map of the Roman empire with the Province Roman Dacia marked red and a map of all Major powers when the Bulgarian Empire was around for comparison. 

>>253398
> Or you could get kicked out by the majority vote, lol.
Part of things not working out. WEW.

back then the birth rate was positive so wars were a totally legitimate way to get rid of incels. it was not seen as, and was not, a loss of any significant value.

>>253405
Not everything is about the same problems we have today

>>253405
This was the dumbest presentation of the youth bulge theory I have ever seen. No. Permavirgin weren't hate filled basement dwellers during all of history neither.

>>253405
At that time rape was a part of warfare too. So some could graduate from inceldom that way. Maybe even your (great)(great)grandma also experienced that.

>>253405
Eternal reminder that there is no such thing as incels and that men can  and do have standards.

ratchild1.png
[Hide] (43.7KB, 650x195) Reverse

ratchild2.png
[Hide] (49.8KB, 658x191) Reverse

>>244434 (OP) 
>Nothing.
Tell that to the bankers who funded both sides, then got to rake in some dirty dough
they literally set themselves for life, they still control and own everything the entire economy and political field are their playgrounds

>>253400
>t. balkie

karma.gif
[Hide] (2.9MB, 345x194) Reverse

>>253410
hence the catchphrase, “have sex incel”

>>253378
>Calling Rome a single nation is quite presumptuous
You're right but also wrong.
You're confusing the whole empire for the core of the empire. You're right that:
> [The empire was] was more like a collective of colonies for the Roman city-state
This is not cosmically different from how Germany in 1911 had African colonies and even parts of Poland and France under its rule. Yet few people would consider subjects with few rights to diminish the nation which was German to the core. 
Another example: Britain. They not only had millions of little niggers under their control, but also Ireland, Wales, and Scotland. The whole empire was not a nation. But the core was.
Now, the Roman core was also more complex than just Rome itself. You had varying degrees of "Roman-ness" in the same way that Scots were British but not English.

The core of Rome was the Latins but very closely linked to them was the Italians in general, excluding the Greeks and Celts.

>>253722
See post: >>253410

>>253725
Correct. Add to this the policy of Caracalla gifting a little Romaness to every free, non subjugated  man in the empire and you get the weird notion that Egyptians are as Roman as some bozos in Asia minor but people inside the city are the most Roman of them all.

>>253764
No u, it should at least be: "have sex volcel" or rather, have sex CELIBATE as it is a REAL word and not a BUZZWORD. Also words like abstinent work better. Saying 'ur involuntarily abstinent' blame shifts it all unto the male, and of course the term, also yet another ETERNAL REMINDER, incel, was coined by a woman and then later it's only men. Really activates my unicorn genes/brains/genetics/etc. It NEVER applies to women! That double standard bullshit is why the word is fake. it's just a word like nigger but for cis white males of whomst are not necessarily misogynists but did complain about women. Complain about them and the blame shift happens via the word incel, an illogical  strawman tactic to imply they were the one rejected rather than the other way around, women being rejected for their lack of  qaulity. Nobody ever called a woman that said "where have all the good men gone?" incel spamtastically but they did do it to the cis white males constantly while banning their groups online and trying to force them into one single honeypot so as to make anyone tht has any sense shut up totally about it rather than possibly be put on a list (and be framed to close a case).

1396889946296.png
[Hide] (58.4KB, 300x281) Reverse

>>253769

assburgers_pondering_a_vital_issue.jpg
[Hide] (33.3KB, 896x722) Reverse

assburger.jpg
[Hide] (4.6KB, 175x288) Reverse

smug_assburger.png
[Hide] (93.5KB, 331x429) Reverse

assburger_keeper.jpg
[Hide] (60.6KB, 650x447) Reverse

assburgers.jpg
[Hide] (26.4KB, 292x271) Reverse

>>253798
Do you have more rare assburgers?

1447362517064.jpg
[Hide] (10.4KB, 315x315) Reverse

>>253819

>>244434 (OP) 
Because white people never valued each other.
Pan-whiteness is a new concept.

>>253820
Too common.

spede6.gif
[Hide] (3.6MB, 340x220) Reverse

>>253830
Forgot the gif.

>>253826
Pan-whiteness is inauthentic in a Heideggerian sense, and American white nationalism is completely retarded. The right needs to look to European identitarianism in this regard. My specific mostly anglo ancestry is not the same as Italians or Slavs and grouping these people together under the category of white does a lot to homogenize the diversity of European people

>>253861
Not him, but you're completely wrong and utterly wrong. Pan-Whiteness/Pan-Euro is the natural convergence point in a diversifying world. It's particular nationalisms that are retarded and those create unnecessary conflicts like Russia/Ukraine and Serbia/Croatia/Bosnia. 

Traditional nationalism is in itself an artificial construct that requires painstaking lengths to maintain the illusion of. "Nationalism" is just masturbatory decadence with no utility. It's completely absurd to try and partition groups of people that both produced Nikola Tesla and Isaac Newton. Racialism is the only real way forward if White people are to survive and achieve independence in a rapidly browning world.

wpww.png
[Hide] (20.1KB, 493x224) Reverse

>>253871

>>253861
>American white nationalism is completely retarded.
That is as retarded as saying that German nationalism is inauthentic.
In 10 BC, German tribes were fighting with each other. Then a greater threat arrived and they unified, briefly, to combat it.
A greater threat has arisen and you're one of the people arguing that we should keep fighting each other rather than the Romans/jews.

>>253871
>Tell me you're american without telling me you're american
You mutts will always be the laughing stock of the world. White unity my ass, no way some mystery meat mongrel can claim equality to the greatness of EVROPA.

>>253902
>"White unity is dumb!"
>"the greatness of EVROPA."

>>253903
EVROPA is not one people or nation, amerimutt go back to /fascist/ and continue your daily larp ritual. The day White unity happens will be the day pigs learn to fly.

>>253861
/thread

autismus_maximus.jpg
[Hide] (88.5KB, 523x720) Reverse

>>253838
Can't resist.

b8c67617cc2d392fe5095af82e8b53e54f145c87d080db35a0794367e22b2258.jpeg
[Hide] (110.8KB, 1489x1220) Reverse

>>253901
> In 10 BC, German tribes were fighting with each other. Then a greater threat arrived and they unified, briefly, to combat it.
Then Hermann's lined up to do a Cesar and the Germanic tribes took another 1000 years until Charlemagne formed the Frankish Reich just so it could split into France and the Holy Roman Empire of German nation. As a result of this, German nationalism had it really, really hard to get taken seriously by the nobility and Germany is still a nightmare to govern, because every little province has a say and the federal government has to cobble out compromise after compromise until any bill gets to the Federal Councli were it could be rejected, because state minister Hein Bloed of Ficklos in Hesse had a problem with it.

You do not want to wish that on the Burgerclaps. You look like retard for even comparing the US Federation with that clusterfuck. Also your testicles will twister, because that comparison is so idiotic.

>>254069
>hard to get taken seriously by the nobility
>the nobility
lol oy vey because village kings wanted to unite white peoples instead of serfs filling the inbred nobles village king chests am i right.

>>254113
Villages had no kangs. You are retarded.

>>254126
Because history showed that Village kings and Cuckstianity wanted united white people???? lmfoaolmfao 
They wanted it so much that it NEVER happened in well over a thousand years. 

You see this is why we can't take you myopic armchair "historian" niggers seriously. 

You're confirmed to be one of these low iq fucking idiots who never know what they're talking about.

>>254127
Villages still has no kings. Stop mislearning Medieval politics from staring at a Fumo.

>>254069
>You do not want to wish that on the Burgerclaps
You're living in a fantasy world. That already exists. White American is literally the only kind of American there is. It is a nation whether you like it or shut your eyes.

>>253906
>EVROPA is not one people or nation
That's literally White nationalism.

Europe.

thread_necro.gif
[Hide] (595.3KB, 286x200) Reverse

N