/b/ - Random

>>312385 (OP) 
>many years ago the government made sure that it was legal to alter historical events to prevent civil unrest
And yet 'who's version of history' is older than our current government.  With Ancient Egyptians vs Mesopotamians documents of  their battling showed they would both say they won a battle. It's just the powers handling their people with their PR(opaganda) bullshitery. The truth is that as an agnostic you can never know the truth. The most intelligent man knows nothing. Why did you even believe what was already written? We were not even allowed to have libraries until the 1700s when the peroid of ((( Enlightenment ))) began and jews were finally allowed into our libraries and so they stopped burnig them down, thus the dark ages ended. What are you going to do about it? Burn it down like a kike? It's your only option, provided that you prefer to go back to the dark ages. Everything that is written is just to control the goyim, to make it into a better gollem. 

History is just his story, not their story, much less the truth.

>>312389
>Why did you even believe what was already written
This is a great question. Without a solid foundation in truth how can you believe anything that was already written without seeing it with your own eyes or testing it yourself?
>What are you going to do about it? Burn it down like a kike? It's your only option, provided that you prefer to go back to the dark ages
If all of it is lies that harm your nation then burning it all down and starting over is preferable to self harm from the lies. The dark ages were much better then this tehcno oligarchy garbage we have now worldwide.

>History is just his story, not their story, much less the truth.
AI detected.

>>312747
So I get poetic and you call it AI? Maybe you don't get the point of the line (a dictator is wrong, the society is wrong, the truth is not known/wrong). I too would ike it burned down but the middle ages sucked, they were christian. You can't stop people from being christian so it'd just be a reset to head back to where we are now and the planet is not getting any younger.

>>312752
the authority was chrrischan, the people werent, it was subjugation not acceptance, goliards made fun of stupid christchan dogma and only people with erectile distinction could take it seriously
not EVEN medieval monks took this jewish nonsense seriously, how ironic

>>312757
They ban being christian by 392 AD, Rome falls by 410 AD and you think nobody believed in ((( God ))) when you weren't even allowed to have pagan libraries during the dark ages and only ((( churches ))) kept books safe? 

If Easter Rome does not fall until 1500 AD then if the peroid of Enlightenment starts by 1700 AD then we were only christian for 200 years voluntarily? Is that why they say technology was held back for 200 years, a lack of actual tyranny? We get a thousand years of 'be a good goy' training from the Eastern "Rome" and they say it was held back only 200 years? I say it was held back starting at 392 and with things like stem cell research being held back to date it's still being held back. 

Considering they kept some pagan books safe at churches I don't disagree, but monks could read and most humans were not monks. Most people believed I be. Some say  estimates say half of Rome were Christians before Weaster Rome even fell in 410, before they even banned it in 392. It's a saying that to get rid of christianity all you have to do is read the bible. I wonder if the Christian Romans could read or were they just listening to jews that could read? What's sad is that some people can read without understanding what they are reading though, infuriating even. My own father has an IQ of about 75, tops, and he used to read the bible front to back and memorize it. Surely there were monks that were like him that the atheist monks had to watch out for that would try to burn the pagan shit up of which is why poems are particlaly surviving to date from the Greeks and the Romans. My head canon says the idiot schizophrenic christians both read and believed and had to be pried off the pagan books as they tried to tear them apart while frothing out the mouth. 

My point being that just because Eastern Rome did not fall until 1500 AD does not mean that the Pagans did not go Christian, what when that was the entire reason they banned Paganism. Can you imagine the flaming Christians attacking Pagans if it went from like 10 percent Chrisitan to 50 percent in a few decades? Some people think it did go up that fast. If it did then when you factor in how angry family members would be at Romans that killed Christians that were trying to get to heaven via suicide from a Pagan Roman's spear then surely there was lots of drama. Not many new born children would be getting raised to believe in Pagan shit when that'd be like raising your child just so it could be curb stomped by a hoard of good goyim. that's my perspective.

*Eastern
*bet
Anyway, it ain't called a LIEbrary for no reason regardless. Pagans were full of shit too, believing in all that fake and gay (literally) shit.

>>312766
Is is better to keep a lying book as a demonstration how to spot lying, or is it better to destroy it? I'd rather do the former. The existence of written word can't be denied as easily as spoken one later. That's why any "oral tradition" goes to shit faster. I'd say destroying books intentionally is done to hide the imperfections of books allowed to remain.

>>312765
im just talking about the medieval period in the west not the late roman empire, the eastern empire was brown so its irrelevant to the dark ages which was in europe and was a result of the western empire collapsing (due to chrischanianity no doubt), the church post collapse was just a remnant of the defacto authority so it just carried forward even though no educated person was genuinely chrischan at this time and it shows if you read medieval manuscripts that are outside of ecclesiastical documents that were specifically commissioned by the church

you dont need to burn books to make them disappear,  you just have to stop preserving them and time does the rest, like i said, goliard verses are found in illuminated manuscripts at a time when literacy was rare, meaning monks and scribes in 'chrischan' monasteries were spending a lot of time and effort copying and preserving fedora tipping texts that were nothing more than satirical mockery on chrischan dogmas and their ridiculous views on a life and society, along with what remained after the collapse. the fact that most documents from antiquity are medieval copies that monks and scribes  personally preserved of their own volition says everything
maybe the uneducated peasants actually believed in the idiotic superstitions nonsense but they couldnt write so all we have is what the educated believed and the majority of them definitely didnt take this garbage seriously, even lamented it which is how the renaissance began in the first place most of the damage was done shortly before and after the collapse of the western empire, everything after that was a slow recovery with chrischanianity being a consequential tumor in the background that the educated disingenuously played along with

Oh no, you got to go look yourself in a library

>>312389
>>311661
>>312765
>>312776
etc
I made this thread to mock >>>/b/311661 >>311661
I didn't even read any of your replies.

>>312939
That's like saying the admin has to read all the replies on this site. WHo made the thread does not dictate what is said in the thread. It's too late to even delete it due to it's age. Do you feel in control?

>>313320
You're a big guy

>>313373
UU
UU