>>307745
This idiot is rehashing the traps argument.
If you are attracted to what seems to be a woman but it turns out to be a man what does it mean?
It means you are attracted to women.
Does it mean that that is a woman?
No, it's a man pretending to be a woman or being mistaken for a woman but its not a woman.
Furthermore from your perspective it was a woman until the truth was revealed that it was a man.
If I give you a piece of chocolate that turns our to be made of plastic, does that make it some sort of new type of chocolate?
No, its plastic mistaken for chocolate. No one in their right mind, no matter how convincing the illusion is until you bite into it, will call it a new type of chocolate.
Furthermore, you are identifying masculinity as equalling male and femininity as equalling female.
A very masculine woman is still a woman, not a man, and a very feminine man is still a man, not a woman.
And this is what I mean when I say that the trannies are the most strict enforcers of gender roles out there.
You cannot be a masculine female, you must be a male, you cannot be a feminine male, you must be a female.
Sex is chromosomes and sex cell production.
What about intersex?
Either pseudohermaphrodites or true Hermaphrodites
In the first care they have a single sex, very cleanly as per my chromosome and sex cell definition
A male with cais is still a male, if you look at the "pussy" you will see it is very easily distinguished from female genitalia.
There's one hole not two, and there is no clitoris. Among other differentiating features.
No one would make the mistake of treating it as a true female setup unless they were retarded.
Females with clits that look like cocks are females whose hormones are out of control, however, those are clearly enlarged clitorises and not penises
Now for true Herms.
We have a merger of opposite sex fraternal twins in the womb, that happens, and now they have two sets of DNA in one human, one of them female the other male.
Right? But one is dominated over the other in every case we've seen.
This is a disorder and perhaps we could say that this counts as a dual sexed individual
What other bullshit arguments are there?
If you can identify as another sex why can't you identify as a different age or race?
Someone who identifies as another race is valid because they assume the experience of being that race when they pass as them
Someone who identifies as another age is valid because at one time they were that age, they know the experience of being seen as the age at which they identify
Furthermore in the case of age and race, we could note that all humans come from Africa, supposedly for the sake of argument, and so everyone gets to be black and receive the benefits we provide to blacks
And as for age identification, we've had terms like mental age which were used in law and other official places for a long time, so why all for a sudden when people are identifying with these ages are they now invalid?
Either we accept all three, or we accept that all three are complete batshit insanity.
Choose it.