/meta/ - Meta

I'm hoping someone on the MODS team replies here...
This /meta/ kinda reminds me of OurChan's /meta/ when I look through it.
A LOT of the same issues and threads.

>>5670 (OP) 
You're fine. Name fagging for the sake of fun threads/ lrp stuff is a perfecftly valid use of the feature. I lifted tyour bans too.

>I know that in other chans this has been a possible datascraping  gambit by glownogs, but I'm not that.
They can just as easily scrape the site, I don't see how using tripcodes aids that.

I thought I was supposed to discourage namefagging, but I was being too autistic about it. I won't interfere with your thread again.

IMG_8844a.JPG
[Hide] (687.8KB, 1488x1111)

>>5672
>>5673
thank you BOTH
I really DO appreciate the travails of being a Mod on a smol chan.
Keep up the good work.
Kek, I already have a wanna-be Doppleganger.
I may have to set up a trip just for that thread.
I will ONLY use it (barring retardation of my own,) ITTs.

>>5673
>I won't interfere with your thread again.
I hope you'll at least stop by and "Get a drink"
you see, I'm a bit of an OC junkie.
My GIMP program runs all the time.
I love the challenge of making a gif or a funny OC maymay on the fly.

>>5673
It's discouraged for general posting. Anon's going to keep it to his themed thread, so it's fine

>>5675
It's still ridiculously obvious who this is regardless if they post with a name or not. They're the type to be identifiably obnoxious and then become self righteously defensive when called out making use of pilpul, doublespeak, and appealing to the more unfortunately tolerant elements of a crowd to justify their religious dedication to attention whoring wherever they go. This is the ubiquitous phenotype which then becomes a phenomenon that has been the main cancer against genuine communication on the internet since it's inception; being more of a burden on the collective senses than whatever may or may not be contributed back every time one overly exposes themselves to the point they are no longer sincere and suck the air out of the room for anyone less shallow than they are. Posting this again because I'm right.

>>5711
Yeah man, they should totally remove name fields from all imageboards! Since the Internet's inception any and all personalities were deemed as unfit for the Borg's collective! Anomalous acitvity detected in sector B three two one nine zero nine. Resisitance is futile.

>>5714
Nigger, this specific rapefuge from ourchan uses this eye cancer posting style everywhere even without a name. Like, seriously, you say this now but imagine if you had to actually engage with this type of poster about something and they were genuinely wrong? Instead of providing a sound rebuttal they would just act their usual way of calling you retarded in conjunction of also being a glownigger while spamming their typical slew of antagonistic reaction gifs while they think they're the sane one.

c90c790cfff31abcbfc8e6b869fd619b9f944b5bca91de06cb356af9da10b59f.png
[Hide] (842.8KB, 667x1000)

>>5715
There's plenty of ways of providing credentials to establish temporary identity anyways in a thread, without the use of namefagging which is atrociously abused (and rightfully banned here it seems). Saying all this as someone who did in fact petition OC's /meta/ to have the policy of banning names and trips all together, although they never implemented my suggestion.

>>5716
My main point is that OP is a conceited spammer because of his narcissistic obnoxious posting style which by it's own nature is identifiable. If this kind of nigger is allowed to have free domain over a 1/4 of the PPD on /b/ it would be an open invitation for more of his kind to follow suite over time and further progress the conversion of the board into a low quality parasocial friend simulator where nothing productive or interesting happens.

>>5717
I see your point. My view of banning names entirely was an extreme version of getting rid of obnoxious, insane, and narcissist posters, yet you gave a clear example of why it doesn't work.

>>5718
Well actually at least in this case it would because this kind of poster thrives on positive reinforcement instead of negative reinforcement so when the digital head pats and cookies stop he'll feel betrayed and just fuck off.

>>5715
Why are you such a sour cock?
>>5715
>but imagine if you had to actually engage with this type of poster about something and they were genuinely wrong? Instead of providing a sound rebuttal they would just act their usual way of calling you retarded in conjunction of also being a glownigger while spamming their typical slew of antagonistic reaction gifs while they think they're the sane one.
AH... this is the LATIN FAGGOT who thought I was someone else.
Dude, you are just a fart huffing asshole who always HAS to be the center of attention..
As is demonstrated here, in MY thread asking for permission after getting B& a few time.
>EYE CANCER
Awww.. Nobody 'CARES about what (you) think other people should adhere to as a posting style.
As a matter of fact, I've Never seen you post OC or even pics usually...On an IMAGE BOARD, no less.
I also have no problems admitting when I'm wrong, unlike yourself.
If you think You know my Posting style so well, you should already know this.
>>5717
>My main point is that OP is a conceited spammer
SLANDER
I've never SPAMMED anything you disingenuous malcontent.
>>5718
KEK!
I guarantee he won't get the subtle implications here.
>>5719
>negative reinforcement so when the digital head pats and cookies stop he'll feel betrayed and just fuck off.
LEL. 
So this is how you faggots do things here huh?
>FUCK Creativity
>Fuck positive social cohesion and fun
>FUCK Individuality and anyone who doesn't Kowtow to meeeeeeee!

In my own thread you'd backstab me, huh?
Good stuff. 
You still haven't apologized for mistaking me for the Latin Pretender, Which I provided proof that it was NOT ME.

How fucking COWARDLY you are.

>>5736
>AH... this is the LATIN FAGGOT who thought I was someone else.
???
>Dude, you are just a fart huffing asshole who always HAS to be the center of attention..
You're the only one who's confidently identifiable in this situation.
>Awww.. Nobody 'CARES about what (you) think other people should adhere to as a posting style.
>>>/meta/5630
>As a matter of fact, I've Never seen you post OC or even pics usually...On an IMAGE BOARD, no less.
>attributing OC to an identity on an anonymous imageboard
Also ourchan was literally a 4cuck off shoot shit heap filled to the brim with faggots like you. I was never "part" of it.
>I've never SPAMMED anything you disingenuous malcontent.
Key word conceited;
>having an excessively favorable opinion of one's abilities, appearance, etc.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/conceited
Your hysterical attention seeking posting style is spam and you don't realize because you're self absorbed.
>So this is how you faggots do things here huh?
This isn't a e-friend hugbox but that doesn't exclusively mean it's supposed to be dogmatic, you want the former and in doing so you accomplish the latter by circumventing the guard rails true anonymity establishes.
>FUCK Creativity
>Fuck positive social cohesion and fun
>FUCK Individuality and anyone who doesn't Kowtow to meeeeeeee!
You're not actually creative, you're not actually fun, you want just want to be included into what you perceive as a friend group.
>You still haven't apologized for mistaking me for the Latin Pretender, Which I provided proof that it was NOT ME.
???

achieved_HUGBOX.jpg
[Hide] (101.2KB, 820x229)

achieveNLGAF.jpg
[Hide] (118.8KB, 820x229)

>>5737
>You're the only one who's confidently identifiable in this situation.
You think so, but I have impersonators. Also, OC stands for ORIGINAL CONTENT you gormless Spazz.
OurChan was more of an offshoot of FrensChan, not 4Cucks. Besides, the point has always been the same. I AM anonymous, and as such I am free to say anything I wish within the bounds of the rules here. this allows a dialog or arguments that come without the pretense or prestige of a known poster. You don't know who I am, and you never will. You don't like me, Fine, IDGAF. But your childish whinging and leghumping about "Muh precious Anonymities!!" just because I use the formatting tools, that are posted in the FAQs, is your problem, Not mine.
I'm following the rules, and YOU DON'T MAKE THEM
>Your hysterical attention seeking posting style is spam
No it's not.
Spam is reposting the same shit overandoverandoverANDOVER
or if you prefer a more "Liberal" definition:
>Sending several messages or posts in a row that don’t build upon each other
>Asking for the same thing repeatedly instead of waiting for someone to respond

> Commenting the same thing on a post several times

>Sharing random or irrelevant messages that don’t provide obvious values to the community

 >Adding an excessive number of random emoji reactions to a post

>Following and unfollowing too much in a short amount of time

>Sending unsolicited messages to other community members

THAT is Spam. I'm surprised at (you) for not being more careful in your Autistic adherance to "Definitions"
>This isn't a e-friend hugbox
I'm not trying to make it into one.
I Don't care if you DON'T LIKE ME, You are line of childishly jealous pixels on a anonymous board with an unwarranted hard-on for being a control freak.
It's fucking RANDOM FFS.
>You're not actually creative, you're not actually fun, you want just want to be included into what you perceive as a friend group.

Oh what a sad, lonely existence you must have to project that onto me.
This place isn't for friends..this is a place you can say things that would get you Doxxed or worse, and where you can find some truth. 
I Don't want to be friends with you, or a lot of the other spergs here; but you may have some truths that are worthwhile to hear.
What do you think I do when I leave for hours and do shit IRL??
The mind reels at what sour concoctions you might come up with, but just because YOU are an abrasive, joyless asshole who doesn't have friends or colleagues IRL, doesn't mean that's the same for everyone else you don't like.

My involvement with OurChan was that of a facilitator and the guy collecting and creating Banners and recruitment OC,(original content, remember?) we almost immediately had a lot of the same issues that zzzChan did, looking at the old /meta/ posts.
I was in constant contact with the Mods and the Owner, SpaceMonkey, until we had a rash of disruptors and Intel,(yes, actual Elgin Faggots,) sowing discord, suspicion and CP,(for good measure I guess?)
>???x2
Okay..so you MAY not be the 'Sperg who had me confused with another anon and was riding my posts, but you sure post just like him.
I'll say it again:
IDGAF if you hate me even, just fuck off then and don't engage me.
This isn't ''YOUR BOARD, or YOUR SITE, or even, let's be real, YOUR FUCKING THREAD, innit?
You are just another anonymous, whinging malcontent to me.
It's too bad really.
I'm not a bad guy when you get to know me. 
The world is a big fucking farce full of scammers and retards, I see NO REASON to make it worse by shitting where you "eat"
Here's some of MY OC:

*I made these in November of 2024, you aren't special.
now FUCK OFF out of MY thread, you Mote.

tanked.png
[Hide] (970.5KB, 921x919)

>>5737
Ironcially I posted that 5630 chided. I liked OP the barkeep until he admitted to having sex with several hippy chicks at once. Is he the same person I chided though in that other meta thread? Anyway, it's not very considerate to do that. I'm sure nobody is a virgin at wizchan either so I meme'd wizchan 2030 into the barkeep thread after that as the point of wizchan was to not anger the crabs as it creates discord. The barkeep threads are an arkanine halfcuck sortra thing but so is pepe and he's allowed here so I'm on the fence about the whole thing. I always hated generals but there's a bunch now so it's whatever. 
>>5738
Barkeeps are supposed to be listeners anon! Anon give me your keyboard-- you're drunk anon! YAMEROO
>impersonators
People thought you were impersonating fagatha is more like!  Before you ask who fagatha is he is not real he is a social constrct. Jokes aside you are paranoid me thinks. 

I make shitty oc too but usually keep it away from here as it never has an application, and other reasons. I made the Hitler pot image of course in ur barkeep thread. RIP the Wild Berry seltzers, I drank all of them in my ebike's range. Images are a  thousand words so I keep changing it's filename from tank yu to tanked. I curently have 129 shitty oc images in a folder of mine. Most are not very original at all. But yeah, this isn't about me, I just reacted to that wild (You) I found in this thread and felt like sharing my thoughts (again). 

Protip: the userbase hates flamboyantly verbose posts even if they are happy as reading such 'verbal verbal diarrhea' drains their mental energy, so they consider it an attack on the mind. They like Osaka and not Tomo, of you see... they have VERY productive things to do and do not want to waste time reading overly long comments, unless such comments are first posessed by the spirit of Terry Davis, then it is okay. Also playing video games all day is not a waste of time, it is perfectly productive and to keep being productive you vwill post in a more boring style and you vwill like it.

-verbal
*if you see
*keep changing image realted's filename, not the pot. 

I managed to coin xtian and +tian here so my memes can stick. Are you a good "autist" or a bad "autist"? *taps head* Thank me later.

c53c91a06ad03b2e14bb8f726074052fc8efe63f47ed9515307ebc19e70357c7.jpg
[Hide] (1.9MB, 2334x3474)

>>5738
Wait a minute, YOU'RE the bartender? And you banged hippy chicks at pagan festivals? Can you share your methods and secrets for doing so?

I'm as hard-right as they come, but they are my absolute weakness. My success has always been hit-or-miss with them, despite doing well with other types.

do_not_have_sex_with_women.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1119x860)

>>5742
Women are not right wing don't do it anon!

he probly got them tanked

Spoiler File
(2.2MB, 3648x2736)

IMG_2402.JPG
[Hide] (4.8MB, 3264x2448)

IMG_0807a.JPG
[Hide] (2.6MB, 1600x1200)

IMG_0849a.JPG
[Hide] (2.4MB, 2000x1500)

IMG_0884a.JPG
[Hide] (4.9MB, 2000x2667)

>>5742
>Wait a minute, YOU'RE the bartender?
Yeah, and as you can see I was asking permission to have that thread, as I have been on the other end of things before.
>And you banged hippy chicks at pagan festivals?
Yeah, but that was a loooong time ago, and I only did that twice,(once at the behest of a GF at the time.) Honestly I turned down way more than I ever bedded, and it's really not magic. I'm really about a 6/10 on a good day, but I can dance and play music that makes them Moooove
besides, pagan chicks are EASY, you just have to be aloof and get more than one interested, then it's like a weird critical mass happens. All women can smell Lorny,(lonely-Horny,) from miles away, so for God's sake, don't ever be a tryhard.
After redpilling I can say I've truly repented. I'm sure with all the damaged young women out there I could "Pull Pussy" if I really wanted to, but honestly, MOST of the time I was at those festivals, I was in a committed, monogamous relationship.
I was more interested in the gals who had something interesting to say, and as I mentioned in the other thread, the 8-10/10s were the WORST in bed.
>>5744
Nope, it was exactly the opposite, they were trying to get me drunk, but I've always preferred sober sex, and since I was often the Bartender in the Woods at those festivals too, I didn't drink more than 4-5 drinks. 6 and I was a round-heel.
You're right about women not being Rightwing--usually. they will adapt to the most significant man in their lives however, so you want one raised by a good man.( I met almost ALL my GFs Fathers, and most were okay. the 2 who didn't have their fathers in their lives were single moms, and shitty parents. they didn't last longer than 4-6 months.

I WAS a degenerate back then, or more correctly Degenerate Tolerant
Those were my first Redpills on just how fucked up FAGS really were.
There were some very good and spiritual times as well.
One Sunday morning I actually did a foot washing ritual around the main fire for everyone who stayed up until the Morning Resh invocation.
I was more of a seeker and "outsider looking in" than an adherent, like an anthropologist but in a contemporary religio-spiritual sense.
Truth is however, most of it was LARPers who lived magical thinking lives and wanted to party in the woods.

Yeeeeeeeeeee....png
[Hide] (154KB, 562x405)

>>5744
Also Checked

d914ed1965fd0794bb26e995077e86114d99a33d531c7959d31292047a5467a1.jpg
[Hide] (220.6KB, 766x1024)

bishoped.png
[Hide] (45.5KB, 348x232)

>even hippies have foot washing 
>arabs do it
>christians do it
>beta males 'do it'
>fascists do it
Why are footfags so pervasive? 
>>5746
I feel like checked could be made into a joke or meme here, what with the chess captcha being what it is. As the years go by I can't recall anyone ever making a get joke crossed with a chess joke though...

>>5747
>I feel like checked could be made into a joke or meme here
Would be a good one...I think you just did.
And I'm not at all a foot fag, IDK what the attraction could be, maybe an imprint on Mommy's feet while crawling on the floor?
Genital stimulation with the olfactory mnemonic lock-in?
Anyway, I did it as a humility in SERVICE thing, from the biblical sense.( I was raised pretty much Calvinist, but by hypocrites)
We heated up a big pot of water on the fire, some women brought lightly scented oils, and I had clean white towels, and several packages of fresh new white socks for after.
A really pretty gal washed mine. After a night of dancing around the fire and wrangling logs as big as myself, it was...
Indescribable how good that felt.
Felt HOLY

>>5748
>And I'm not at all a foot fag, IDK what the attraction could be, maybe an imprint on Mommy's feet while crawling on the floor?
Look at toddlers and children's feet splayed out, facing you, in photos. The correlation between foot fags and pedos is undeniable.

>>5749
>The correlation between foot fags and pedos is undeniable.
I'm not sure about that.
I know there's a Pedophilia/Podophilia joke in there somewhere, but Pedos deserve the rope.
Those two paraphilias appear to be completely separate, other than the strong correlation between one OR the other with temporal lobe dysfunction.
I still think it's more likely, (provided they aren't in some way brain damaged,) that this is a sexual imprint caused by crawling up to their "GOD" Mommy's stinky feet, while simultaneously stimulating their genitals through friction. Much like the imprint vulnerability of goslings onto the first round object they come into contact with after hatching. 
Paired with the incredibly strong olfactory mnemonic, I really think this is the "why".
Paired with the evidence that it's almost exclusively Males with this fetish, and only a slight increase in Homosexual males vs. Heterosexual, NORMAL males, to it; I'd lean heavily on it being an early imprint of confused signals of MOMMYNurturingdiscipline==sexual stimulation. It would seem from my scant reading on it, that many footfags have a predilection for being dominated by the women as well.
>Looks up list of paraphilias
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olfactophilia
Okay... Other than possibly pictophilia and a light bit of  Integumentophilia with a pretty gal, I don't have ANY of that.
...and I think i've had enough Intarrwebs tonight.
I may have nightmares.

OOPS!
This time formatting worked against me.
>*MOMMY=Nurturing=discipline=sexual stimulation.

>>5750
I remain convinced that podiatric fags are pedophiliac fags. Look at that Nickelodeon jew that raped all the kids on the shows (and made the damn logo his fetish) or Quentin Quarantino with pictures of him licking little girls' feet (which ancient 4chan found and verified long ago). The feet being splayed out is what babies, infants, and kids do. Loli lovers also love feet. If it was the smell alone, they wouldn't be aroused by the images.

>>5753
> Look at that Nickelodeon jew that raped all the kids on the shows (and made the damn logo his fetish) or Quentin Quarantino with pictures of him licking little girls' feet (which ancient 4chan found and verified long ago). 
Yeah, I was In those threads.
You're talking about Dan Schneider.
>pics
While I'm certainly not an apologist for either, I''m not convinced that one necessarily includes the other.
You gotta remember, these HollyJew Fucks were into Every deviant and satanic act. 
while the Brain damaged might be inclined to multiple forms of paraphilia, I'm still not convinced that when the day comes I should Roof-hole every single footfag alongside the pedos.
If you wanted to start a thread on it I could contribute greatly to it's content, having several folders about PG; but I'm really not into pursuit of it HERE
There is a practically unused /pol/ board here.
I'll wager that could kick it back into life.

>>5738
>I AM anonymous
You are are identifiable through superficial means (unique but arbitrary and excessive post stylization) and not because of innate qualities that manifest naturally through honest intentions which would also contribute to the vibrancy of the landscape while still maintaining the advantages anonymity. You are immediately identifiable because you choose to post like this everywhere even outside of your "bar tender" thread or this thread.
>IDGAF if you hate me even, just fuck off then and don't engage me.
You aren't just another anon, you are whether through hastened inconsideration or for intentionally self serving reasons establishing yourself as a known figure through your performative posting style combined with you providing more information about yourself than what's warranted and across the website even before I called you out in this thread.
>You are line of childishly jealous pixels on a anonymous board with an unwarranted hard-on for being a control freak.
>It's fucking RANDOM FFS.
You aren't as spontaneous as you believe yourself to be and it is actually you who is taking control by posting so fervorously in this small space with a largely substanceless manner to the point you drown out others who don't post like you and gradually shift the website to be more quantity orientated over quality orientated to compensate for the noise people like you make, which there inevitability will also be more performative people like you who take after your "original" posting style if left unchecked as you already have pointed out.

Also before you accuse me of being a glownigger for deleting and revising my post it was because I added a last minute addition that I realized was essential to point.
>posting so fervorously in this largely substanceless
<posting so fervorously in this small space with a largely substanceless manner

Oh yeah and another thing your posts are fucking annoying to have to sift through and read. Like I said before this thread was nuked, you don't actually put yourself in the headspace of the people you subject to your posting style.

BAG-O-DICKS.jpg
[Hide] (85.7KB, 800x800)

1587702021406.jpg
[Hide] (40.2KB, 460x359)

1606418143215.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1337x1400)

>>5756
> and not because of innate qualities that manifest naturally through honest intentions
Bullshit.
>You are immediately identifiable because you choose to post like this everywhere
MOAR Bullshit.
I have been mistakenly mis-Identified LOTS of times here. By (you) as well.
>even before I called you out in this thread.
Not your place, this thread has nothing to do with you, I was contacting the MODS, IDGAF about your prissy desires of conformity.
>through your performative posting style
You misspelled Expressive
How else does one express tone and inflection via txt?
>You aren't as spontaneous as you believe yourself to be
Cope.
You NEED someone to rail against, don't you? It's your entire persona.
>you drown out others who don't post like you
BULLSHIT
But then, here's the "Nut of the issue" isn't it? YOU don't like to FEEL "drowned out" or outshined or something.
I'll bet you are exactly the guy standing in the corner in the party meme.
>which there inevitability will also be more performative people like you who take after your "original" posting style if left unchecked as you already have pointed out.
So, it all boils down to you being SCARED of something.
Good.
Fuck off now, this thread served it's purpose 2WEEKS ago
>>5675
now go scuttle off to your sour smelling basement with your delusions of control and superiority..
~OR~
Engage me not as a nemesis, but as a collaborator.
As I said you've already proven yourself wrong many times already, since you've misidentified me over 10X here both from my *whiney voice* performative posting style and other post where you couldn't pick me out of a whole thread.
>before you accuse me of being a glownigger for deleting and revising my post it was because I added a last minute addition
I've never done that to you or anyone else here.
>>5758
True Main Character syndrome.
I have had lots of engagement here. POSITIVE engagement.
You should think about that...
You aren't that important,and neither am I
You've wasted so much time on this...Changing NOTHING
>Like I said before this thread was nuked
???
Okay, you're insane.
Nobody "Nuked" this thread, and If some of your posts were deleted, either (you) did it, or the Mods did.
I already KNOW that you are the type of sperg who Has to have the last word, so go ahead reply, and you'll get even MOAR
of the selfsame thing you claim to HATE.

>the meta thread keeps getting bumped rather than the actual drinking thread
<Am I the only one that drinks every day? Ugh. 
>11 more hours until can drink as work is in the way 
>will drink then fall asleep
>won't likely post in the drink thread as the day will loop again 
<oh... not my day off yet.. our days off probly don't align... so the meta thread is more powerful
aaaah the French

1611093278484.jpg
[Hide] (60KB, 294x361)

>>5760
KEK!
I'm not the one who keeps returning to it, to cowardly snipe on a thread that I hadn't been back to for 2 weeks until the shitflinging autist kept posting to it.
then, as you might have well seen, there were several POSITIVE interactions amidst his,(not going to assume you are he,)impotent FUMING

Whatever.
You think you know me, you don't,
You have me "Pegged" as someone who doesn't even exist ITT.
I'll wager also, you think (you)r post will make me scurry to go post in MY thread, which was only ever a /b/ thread that I've been in in other chans that was fun.
That's the point here right? Have fun, spread Info, argue positions?
My last 3 weeks have been all about preparing to move into my new property, and as I am self-employed, I Could drink all day, every day if I wanted to, but not only am I a lightweight,(as previously mentioned ITT,) I also have better shit to do than get soused like a lush every day.
I keep my drinking to weekends and a few days during the week in the evenings after a long hard, physical day.
So...
that's all you get from me on that.
You know who you sound like to me?
Nah... Nevermind, unless you live in a cuckshed in AK with a storebought exterior door because the first one you made was full of Youtube FAIL, then you wouldn't fucking have a clue to whom I am referring to.

Lots of whiny assholes in the world who don't DO fuckall IRL but complain. Do you really want to be one of those?

<Back to packing...FAGGOT

>>5761

Not looking at your spoiler, faggot
BTW, there is SeePee on the /b/ catalog.
I've reported it, HAVE YOU?

>>5763
Sorry, got it.