/b/ - Random

>>326165 (OP) 
>attractive
>autistic
They're probably not. They're claiming to be autistic for attention. Extra points if they've picked it up from a TikTok rabbithole; there are known occasions of girls claiming to have Tourettes syndrome and exhibiting the exact same tics as a specific TikTok user who makes videos about her having Tourettes syndrome.
Doesn't help that doctors are overdiagnosing people in general with neuropsychiatric disorders, not just women faking symptoms to get diagnosis papers from doctors to feel special on the Internet.

>>326168
You are retarded. Possibly gay. Maybe trolling

>>326169
>You are retarded.
<if i say it first, he can't say it back
You're a gullible retard falling for their tricks. Your brain has to do more thinking than your balls.

zMvRwRTR8cJMxDq83fukdCy5yS3.jpg
[Hide] (103.5KB, 1080x1080) Reverse

>>326165 (OP) 
I don't know who the bitch in the OP is, but... picrelated.

>>326173
Brief explanation for 3 of the images:
Middle: Chinese or just East Asian meme that basically says "this is what chinese girls in glasses look like, lol". Got spread around the internet by yellow fever fags.
Middle left: Japanese "yandere" woman who stabbed her boyfriend. I don't remember if it was fatal or not.
Bottom left: Isabella Loretta Janke, the woman who manipulated Chris-chan into fucking his mother. CIA nigger parents, lived like a slob, fungus in her toenails.

>>326165 (OP) 
I like how women don't suffer socially when diagnosed with autisms but the men do, thus implying autism is not what they say it is. Women can't be 'autistic'. 
>>326173
>that fake word
They are not real in either sex, voluntary or otherwise, even if autists are real.

>>326173
>femcel
This can't possible be correct as I would be willing to cum inside them multiple times and not even care that they will try to kill me afterwards.

1778771613336350.jpg
[Hide] (39.5KB, 735x420) Reverse

>>326180
The Scandinavians of old believed that trolls were to be left alone and avoided. Similarly, online people are mentally ill and engaging with them is generally inadvisable

481964020_1197863015031814_3313721458516842390_n.jpg
[Hide] (463.2KB, 900x900) Reverse

>>326180

Some small changes could make anyone attractive, TV shows have lots of skillful people working on clothes, hair, makeup, lighting, you could search any actor/actress and find some ugly shots and some very good. 

About the show, neuronormies fail to produce something relatable for us neurospiced people, it's not marketable, you could not sell to most western media some high budget show that is bland looking, boring and at the same over specific, detailed and carefully crafted.
It's hard to have real autism in media nowadays. They'd tag anyone too creative as as unproductive or too unpredictable and when they rarely hit success they get punished by being demanded more and more content, slowly normielizing it to get a bigger audience.
I hate the mainstream media.

>>326186
>neuronormies
>neurospiced
What kind of Reddit copypasta is this?

OP is a faggot and a retard

golden_why.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1266x919) Reverse

>>326183
Why do you post this (over and over again) and what does it mean?

>>326177
Women get easy mode on literally everything except shitting out a kid because their only purpose in life is to get fucked.

>>326199
>giving bith
>no easy mode
They have c-sections now and after having a child they can get ya with child support and that's it they made it!

>let's unironically talk about muh reality TV because uh... pretty autistic girl...
You know what? The Jews are completely right about us. We're goyim and deserve to be treated like cattle.

>>326200
Isn't that right that a c-section weakens the uterus wall, making it 'inadvisable' to have more than one kid? Coincidentally.

>>326201
This is why you should have pushed back against the xitterfication of imageboards.

>>326203
>mooooo mooo moooooooooooooooo
Shut it, goy.

>>326202
My mother had two children and both were c-sections. Sounds made up. 

Also, I forgot to mention abortions. In the past women had it rough without abortions and without c-sections. 

The only reason women have it rought now is that they have an instinct to go with assholes and hate nice guys, unironically.

>>326201
You're no better than the OP for even knowing what the image related is from.  

I'd not have replied if I knew it was from "reality" tv. I was just compelled to remind everyone and or let them know that women don't actually get autism so the premise of the thread is wrong. "Autists" like homely and virgin(istic) women. What if autist means modesty and being immodest is what being 'degenerate' meant all along? It is. And you are hated for being a modest male rather than acting like a kike that wants to chase money and women all day. Cameras change things just by being there so reality tv was never reality of course and even if it were the types that agree to participate are hystrionic and that is more of a immodest personality now isn't it?

>>326205
>both were c-sections
Right. That second c-section was more or less mandatory because of the first one, I guess. That's what results from me repeating something recalled only vaguely. It's inadvisable to try typical birth after a c-section.

>>326204
Whatever. You were probably posting zoomer wojacks on this site back in 2021.

>>326207
I wish we had test tube babies already. The man could decide to abort it at that point. Not her body, not her choice.

>>326212
Artificial wombs and then Bokanovsky factories!
Hell, some women are even praising artificial wombs because they're scared of pregnancy and how it can fuck the body up. This might be a bit of a warning sign, especially if they're REALLY disgusted or put off by the process of pregnancy. Especially bad if they're calling the baby a "parasite" or anything similar.

spm9y9j127oa1.jpg
[Hide] (14.8KB, 679x379) Reverse

>>326201
>let's unironically talk about muh reality TV because uh... pretty autistic girl...
Yes.

cutest_girls.png
[Hide] (141.8KB, 358x400) Reverse

>>326201

b03d2ba3635c8629516905b0998b969738848af716070ffb735435816dc57c91.gif
[Hide] (433.2KB, 220x220) Reverse

i think if people recognized the architectural tricks these shows employ to produce conflict they would have more value. the number of failed reality shows extolls how little tv execs understand about both their audience and the actors. i forget the study but it was before big brother went on the air; a happy family was paid to live in a non-descript home used by a univercity to study family dynamics/psychology, cameras everywhere no contact by the researchers similar setup to what reality tv promises; every sponsored family that moved in had problems, there was a joke that the place was haunted. after decades of study the general concensusous was the open floor plan left no place for the family members to seek shelter from each others judgemental eyes.
the very quality that made it efficient to videotape made it impossible to study a health family.
i accidental recreated a similar setup in my rental and a tenant was outcasted by her peers broke a window and i have had members of the police department express their satisfaction that the eviction processes was ongoing.
tldr: small open concept homes let small conflicts escalate into tv worthy meltdowns.

i feel guilty, because i am aware of the environment i setup, but the home appraisal value went up after the remodel, soo is the doctor who prescribe meth for a cold a bad guy?

>>326266
>doctor who prescribe meth for a cold a bad guy?
yes, rental units are for the young and now somebody has a police record because of your incompetence.