/b/ - Random

>>317197 (OP) 
I don’t think it’s illegal in the US, but of course if you did it, you will be bullied, boycotted, maybe even attacked and beaten up, if not outright killed. Which makes all this talk about freedom of speech in the constitution an illusion.

>>317199
((( social justice )))

11cd39952cd377f4b3e0d0b925944a6712b70122.jpg
[Hide] (119.5KB, 1150x1266) Reverse

Well if the average foreigner you found in your country was of the same quality as the japanese do (i.e. retarded American/European tourists) then banning them would be widely accepted practice there too.
Which shows how acceptable discriminating against whites has become.

>>317199
>>317202
((( they ))) figured out that censorship is much more effective when it is (seemingly) supported by a large number of people
this way it becomes a conflict between different groups of people instead of "the people vs the government"
it's all part of the plan, divide and conquer

>>317205
And the method used was that the rules of conduct for public institutions and for those acting to represent them in that capacity should be the same as for private citizens representing themselves and nobody else. What's the justification for that equivalence?

>>317197 (OP) 
This reminds me of how niggers at fast food places pee or rub their genitals in food if it's ordered by White people. they think they're "getting at" White people. It's very effeminate, but that's just what bugs and nigs are like (mental women).

>>317257
CCTV surveillance.