/b/ - Random

>>313166 (OP) 
Its a blessing, because artificial intelligence can never best natural stupidity

same
>>313169
That means it isn't intelligence

f6ae9a3cddb3c24cb445131d8dde9d688e55aafd30e7058586d7251fc85a2fa4.jpg
[Hide] (45.6KB, 475x600) Reverse

small brains can dodge blunt impacts

f82e0f1bfb6e49912c51c5f20903937f4df2f614506b55ee2fbc29b7f9515691.png
[Hide] (154.7KB, 416x480) Reverse

Being smart is overrated and being retarded might actually be good now. If you are dumb then society doesnt expect much from you and smarter people you work with will feel bad for you and are more likely to help you out of pity. Just dont be mean and you will be ok. I dont need expensive things to make me happy and the whole "survival of the fittest thing" doesn't work anymore. I probably will get scammed a lot but whatever.

>>313192
If you are going to be dumb, be wise. 
Otherwise it just sucks. It's also easy to become dumb fast with drugs so I think being smart at least to explore what you want out of life is important to do first, If you are dumb you need an environment that will nurture you since you will be at the whims of it. 
Dumb builds need either wisdom or simple habits all rooted in ol' reliable things. basically the saying
>me like x, simple as. 
x just needs to be time-tested, go instinctual mode.

I am actually pretty happy being dumb.

>>313166 (OP) 
You only think you're dumb due to the nature of competition. "No such thing as bad student only bad teacher, teacher say, student do." We were like 80+ percent farmers and farmers only need an IQ of like 65 or something really low like that. We've got tons of people that are below 100 a little but they aren't near 65 so we all feel like shit due to  trying to compete with those over 100. Too many cheifs and not enough indians. They took many jobs away with automation and outsourcing. It's not your fault a tractor does the work of a thousand men and every entry level programmer is employed from India/China to save shekels. If they told you to sweep the streets from a young age we'd all be better for it but they don't even want to pay anybody for that with how uppity everyone became. They have street sweaper machines to it instead, well, sometimes. Every long while I see one. I guess the cops got most of the tax money so they can't afford to automate that. Another flat bicycle tire YAAAAY

Anyway, humans are too intelligent. A raven is like 1 billion neural clusters, a human is like 100x that. A dog is half a raven. A cat is half a dog. Why do you need to have the intellectual capacity of 400 cats to farm and build houses? Did humans even need to be that smart in the first place? We could still be hunting and gathering. We should return to monke until we evolve into a more sane animal. Your brain is mostly being used to give you  nightmares. If our leaders were fewer and more sane they'd make sure the dumb stayed ignorant to make everyone happy rather than cage rattle them constantly for no logical reason.

wheat.jpg
[Hide] (308.9KB, 599x465) Reverse

>>313379
>farmers only need an IQ of like 65 or something really low like that
You do know what happened to bread basket of africa when only 65 IQ farmes were left in country?

I am a brown person and I know the truth that whites did nothing wrong in the sub sahara, it is the non-whites and have always been them who are wrong and treat you whites in a very complexy and massively unfair manner.

>>313384
I assume you mean that Africa can't make it's own food without our help due to being too dumb when in reality they were lazy niggers.

>>313386
They are dumb and lazy, and more over don't have the instinctual framework to be farmers.

>>313379
>Anyway, humans are too intelligent.
For you. Still not intelligent enough to develop space industry that would use mostly resources from outside Earth to support itself. Or commercially viable nuclear fusion technology. Or lots of other ideas simple in principle, but difficult in application. The more moving parts, the more confusing the design, generally. And simple questions tend to have difficult answers. Unless you settle for  half-measures that are part lies.

>>313421
Relevant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3#Nuclear_fuel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3#Moon

6354cdaab96cc60a59df59ce39d61c8f.png
[Hide] (10.2KB, 350x450) Reverse

dont let societal psyops bum you down
im retorted too but i realized that thats ogey
say yes to being dumb

E1KtQ1tUUAEHmzB.jpg
[Hide] (78.7KB, 1024x988) Reverse

>>313166 (OP) 
He didn't choose the retard life; the retard life chose him

>>313421
What does space have that the Earth does not? Is it wise to waste resources trying to get things going up there? It's not an intelligence thing it's a 'only a rich man would be able to pull it off' thing and there's no reward, only risks that your geekdom business venture will fail. No one even gave a shit about space travel or the original Saturn V missile schematics would not have been lost. They were just being prideful towards the Russians, triggered that a second world nation had better technololgy than them. What with how they faked the moon landing, at least the video of it, it might not even be possible to travel in space. Even if it is what highly important individual would actually risk their life trying such things? We can't send dumb ass mice to experiment with, it's going to be highly important individuals that will nope at the drop of a hat just as rich people taht could go make a helium 3 mine on the moon will nope. Is it really intelligent to mine fuel for the sake of a status quo? We'll get there, eventually, but only after we run out of oil and coal here. Your children's chidlren will enjoy the 'intelligence' of being a slave to the oiligarchy family I guess. People can't even agree on political things and you think space travel is the intelligence issue. "I am an animal, I travel far, hear me roar". 
>>313448
Nuclear shit is hard to use in outer space. It's not like aa submarine where it can just use heat and push water around. There's nothing to push in space. Going to the moon to mine fossil-fuel 2.0 is gay.

>>314321
nuclear space reactor is heterogeneous eugenic genetics fission eugenics neutron dissociation neutrino proton beta particle society 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope

and nuclear family is eugenic genetic phenotype of society 
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nuclear

im NOT a low iq peabrain

>>314321
The Moon is tide-locked with Earth, so any stationary structure on it would face the same direction relative to it, with some small variations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking
A stationary mass driver would be a relatively cheap way to send anything bulky back here from above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver
It would need substantial amount of electricity for each run though. Hence the need for a Moon based power plant for it to work.

>>314325
>nuclear family
Irrelevant

Nuclear power in space just on it's own as a nuclear power core merely creates electricity. Without propellant, of which will run out, it's gay. What are you going to do with it? Glow and wiggle while drifting? They like to use fancy words like electrodynamic tether of which a tether is still just a wiggling wire. The thing is stranded. Ion thrusters use propellant too and are weak as fuck. It's all gay. 

>>314336
We don't actually need to go there. It's desolate. It's insane to want to leave Earth if we don't have some magical gravity drive to get us moving. If we don't have the power to warp time and space with gravitational vectors then it's all highly homosexual. If we had something clever like using angular momentum to move around, maybe through using super fast rotating magnetic liquid to create a gravitational vortex, say in a tube, then I'd get behind it, but we don't have any of that and if we did we don't have controlled fusion anyway to create massive constant energy and if we did then fuck mining fuel from that dead rock in the first place. Why do you want to go there? It'd dead. Everything up there is dead. 

>mass driver
That's some Wile Coyote shit.

Boys dream of going to space. Men understand that the true path to happiness is through solipsism and hallucinogen abuse.

>>314341
>and hallucinogen abuse.
So they're still going to space.

718c50cd536bb07892172a769949dd97c52ab3c5297b83cef903a626167204f7.webm
[Hide] (4.5MB, 04:37)

>>314337 (me)
It will be funny when patent US20120062059A1 proves Newton's third law to be fake and also gay. 
>>314343
>lol

>>314321
>What does space have that the Earth does not?
Does the Earth have a safe way of disposing radioactive trash, for example? Or is encasing it in concrete and then tossing into some marine trench safe enough?
And are you dense enough to read
>Still not intelligent enough to develop space industry that would use mostly resources from outside Earth to support itself. Or commercially viable nuclear fusion technology.
not as two SEPARATE examples, or are you just trolling?
Fusion technology for generating electricity here on Earth, not specifically for powering some spacecraft. That would have additional design restraints, strange to worry about when the primary, basic requirements for working at all with minimum efficiency are still not met.

>>314401
inb4 some weirdo claiming that higher background radiation is actually a good thing har har, how funny

>>314421
Funny you should mention that...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564529/#S9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561730/

>>314401
>Does the Earth have a safe way of disposing radioactive trash, for example?
Tossing it into the sun somehow, eventually.

>>314580
>electromagnetic spectrum is all about gamma radiation frequency
You tried. Hide from sunlight, it might give you cancer too, after all.

>>314732
I guess that bait was too ionizing for me.