Dress to impress!
Some of the same people will call this "high art" while saying that anime isn't
Hey, some of those are still fun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cook_(Arcimboldo) And lots of anime pictures are too mass-produced to still count as "high" art. Not much novelty in copying a known design that was done countless times already. It goes from art to craft, and then boring kitsch that's hard to differentiate from AI drawings.
>>312405 Both the pic you just posted and the 5th pic in the op looks like ai slop yet that is somehow excusable because it was painted by a human. Give me a break
>>312406 If you expect the only emotion button the picture presses for you has to be "cute", then sure. Art in general is not necessarily about cuteness and reacting to it. It's about manipulating the viewer the certain way the author was paid to. Some sponsors had as peculiar tastes as furries today. Same with some painters themselves. And some paints used were outright toxic with arsenic, mercury or lead content, lol. With possible side effects regarding the painter's cognition.
>>312410 Like the paint thinner today inhaled too much might make you lightheaded, lol.
>>312411 >>312410 If the art in question isn't supposed to look pretty it's trash in my book
>>312403 (OP) 1st, 4th and 5th take a relatively high level of skill, most anime doesn't. Anime is visually appealing, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily difficult or technically taxing. 4th was even used as a study in an art class I had.
>>312412 Any strong reaction is a win for some creators. Like in that saying "there's no such thing as bad publicity". Just anything is better than being forgettable. And you know that the expression "flavor of the (insert period)" was made for a reason.
>>312403 (OP) my fruity and vegetably ass in the last pic
>>312410 And in a world without photography it would be more important to reproduce the likeness of a particular person/object than to render them more visually appealing instead. Different priorities would lead to different habits, and those would manifest themselves even if depicting complete fiction too. Most of reality isn't particularly cute, is it?
>>312406 The reason people hate AI is because: >it is child locked and you cannot actually control it (when computers are telling you what to do/think then you know shit's got bad) >it takes away jobs (with no possiblity of UBI in sight) >it looks inorganic (so does post cgi anime, especially moe, no longer drawn by hand like in the 1990s) <but that makes anime AI! I know... and yet no one ever complained except for the ones that know that manga is better. >>312403 (OP) How high is high? I think high art should only be that fruit man and or images like my own picture related. Like, does it make you feel high, or is it just basically a fake photograph with various autism levels? >high art meaning some educated rich person made it >caring People think stupid shit like PIcasso is high art. It's shit.
>>312753 >some educated rich person made it <some educated rich person commissioned it, or spent a fortune on it, usually posthumously for the creator Fixed that for you.
>he honestly thinks that the rich buy paintings because of passion and the paintings themselves being good enough to warrant that kind of money Anime wins again
Who is that he? The idea of a conversation piece is not anything especially surprising. Or it shouldn't be.
>>317040 Vid related, lol.
>>317041
>>317040 So you are really dumb enough to believe that billionaires buy $1 million+ dollar paintings as conversation pieces? Lol, you are a fucking retard
>>312403 (OP) why would anyone care about that?
>>317050 No, they start as them. What happens later would be without impact on their content, wouldn't it? At least that was what OP was complaining about.
>>317058 Sure they are buddy. Conversational pieces on how ugly they are lol
>>317060 Nobody pays for being made fun of. Probably.
>>312403 (OP) in a world this shitty
>>312403 (OP) Thats because they are based snobs
I really should attempt to get into high culture.