>>236594
>you're retarded for thinking this way
>this fiction is proof of what would happen
You're the one being hilariously "smart", though not evolved nor wise, for not understanding the point of arguing through hypotheticals. Your hypothetical supposed retort is seemingly 'read this book bro'. You can stop any argument that way and only an absolute dupe would say 'okay I'll get back with you to see if I agree but only after I read this giant waste of time for a week'. All the cavemen would have to do to beat you is to write in gibberish, pretend there's a cipher that leads to Nazi gold, and watch you die of starvation trying to solve it. Also, mustard gas in a primitivie scenario? Did they make computer monitors too and sit on their asses? The Ancients had sulfuric gas that could kill you in a hole but making mustard gas over night is not likely. It takes standing on the shoulders of giants to do anything of intellectual value in an advanced way. Generations have to go by before you can make anything so being overly intelligent is useless if the technology and the economy, the libraries that evolved into factories that spit out all this tech and the advanced transporation and trade routes that lead to everything being connected, giant boats and trains that are no longer there, you can't do anything without the materials and evolved tools. You would have a spear and so would they. Nothing else. No, not even gun powder as that takes months to make from your piss. Say the tech is already there and the caveman still wins because retards can fire guns and they will run faster, are braver for being dumb, won't get so stressed out like the nerds will while ruffing it, etc. Everyone knows the astronaughts get eaten by the cavemen, all wise men know the answer to the hypothetical and it is meant to humble you. The Indians are needed more than the Chief and in this society we have a bunch of uppity retards thinking they are supposed to be the chief when we already have far too many chiefs and not enough Indians. What does 'advanced' even mean? Convenience. Nothing more. It caters to weakness. The chief is an old useless wiseman and we've got young useless naive people that think they should be royalty over how many books they can read. It's unhinged. The priorities are off. You're not really learning anything that can help you and if being adhd is something we evolved to have to help us sense danger then you actually are harming yourself by trying to work against your own instincts, and for what? So you can be more advanced. More advanced at what? Making money? Blue collar workers make money faster than college types and theyr'e dumb as bricks so it's not money. Power? Sub 80 IQ felons have that with brute strenght and connections with real people rather than papers in the page of a book being moved by spidery hands. What is this power you're looking to find in books? Too true you can become smart and rich, but if you're an adhd retard... what a pathetic display. The books is cheaper than a drug and easier to maintain than tv shows via computers, that's it's only real value. Go ahead and think shit like botany 'knowledge' will apply to your local landscape, imbicile. What are you gonna do? Read a car manual and then magically have access to the stools it takes, tools that cost many thousands, to fix a car? Knowledge is hardly ever power. Health books? Do you own that medicine or is it controlled? How you gonna get it? What power do books hold, I can't think of anything. Mostly just bible thumpers end up with the power end of that shitty stick and the rest it's just 'children' entertaining themselves now that they can't get drugs anymore in this 'advanced' society. It has advanced into what? It's advanced into being backwards to the point of having no common sense. It will come full circle and die and when that happens what you saw as bad shall become good. The smart will seem stupid and the criminals will make all the rules and the people will love them for it.
>>235443
Maybe you have to have adhd and wisdom to get it! That's what you get for reading well written books!
>>235409
The point of the hypothetical does not need to include rebuilding society. We don't even need society. That was not the point. The point is that you are supposed to know your place and not think you're going to 'make it'. Society itself won't 'make it'. Can't believe I have to go over this line of comments twice.
>>235423
The point of a hypothetical is not meant to necessarily be realistic.