/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

National Socialist and Third Position Discussion


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Message*
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


d4be00b6783c2c721916c6543cb175bb3bffd3758c7d573b555433a21bd1ba32.jpg
[Hide] (276.8KB, 960x1197) Reverse
2de76ba49da2cbebdb34ebae0dd41f05b7d207ccd67048e88362ce85e05bc80f.jpg
[Hide] (94.3KB, 794x1059) Reverse
aa84d1543bd8a4d34f4eb3b07836f31b2475e4361c28e344c595057122f398df.jpg
[Hide] (21.5KB, 287x620) Reverse
bcaf9b10d84b5f21d0c623e52120711186a1dd5c4605b82e7e988628561da614.jpg
[Hide] (59.1KB, 1105x1000) Reverse
Jews have been funding, producing and disseminating pornography.
Entire generations of young people are exposed to pornography at a young age now and weigh everything remotely sexual on a scale of pornography.
The assault on beauty and erotic material and is so vile and wide that even the concept of eroticism is completely excised from the minds of hundreds of millions of young White males.
The least pornographic content is now called softcore pornography. But what is it exactly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softcore_pornography
>Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography, film, imagery, or even audio that has a pornographic or erotic component but is less sexually graphic or intrusive than hardcore pornography, defined by a lack of sexual penetration or other sexual activity. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in suggestive poses or scenes, and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful.
>The distinction between softcore pornography and erotic photography, or erotic art such as Vargas girl pin-ups, is largely a matter of debate. When the subject is naked, the image must be differentiated from nude art, and photos belong within the broader category of nude photography. 

If reading this kind of subversive garbage doesn't make your blood boil then you're a despicable normoid who's dead inside or some huge faggot.
I went looking for the lewdest of lewd paintings by Vargas, if there were any considering the very aggressive claim made by the article. There would be nothing pornographic because that wasn't the man's style. Period. If there is any I wonder what it must look like.
Today zoomers don't know anything about eroticism. They don't know the word itself and couldn't even point at erotic material even if their lives depended on it.
Everything is a shade of "porn."

Softcore pornography is a made up term for a made up category to sow confusion in our minds. Jews know that we intuitively hate pornography, it destroys us.

• Eroticism respects and enhances a woman's femininity and beauty.
• Pornography debases and desecrates the woman's body.

Even with the worst expression of eroticism you could never reach below what would come off as some embarrassing cheesecake, and that's it.
Replies: >>9683
>>9682 (OP) 
It sounds like you might be a coomer.
Replies: >>9685
Spoiler File
(67.5KB, 346x512) Reverse
Spoiler File
(69.4KB, 362x506) Reverse
Spoiler File
(69.4KB, 380x510) Reverse
Spoiler File
(65.8KB, 380x510) Reverse
Spoiler File
(65.8KB, 344x504) Reverse
Spoilers because tits and I don't know what the policy is there. That's really the most explicity material I could find yet, but I still fail to see where the tinge of pornography could be found in this.
>>9683
Found the circumcised faggot.
Replies: >>9688 >>9689
That one Goebbels speech regarding puritan outrage over some soap commercial comes to mind.
Replies: >>9690 >>9753
>>9685
>lack of self-control
strange flex but ok
Replies: >>9690
>>9685
Circumcised guys probably masturbate more because their dick heads constantly rub against their underwear. Also they can never be fully satisfied since their dicks are broken

But yeah porn is for faggots and so is "eroticism." Muslims are right to ban most displays of female nudity, though I'm not saying we should burn all these old paintings like ISIS would do
Replies: >>9692
6da1e9b79607f8fae6aa5729422810b098d60fc3d4b87b8582eb31eb54e1cd4e.jpg
[Hide] (82.1KB, 370x512) Reverse
e6eb328a99e79bb6a9c58237fe23819721b540049f40ef34fceee65fbd33c891.jpg
[Hide] (79.3KB, 344x514) Reverse
2f07b41fe8ce0b088763500038c88b8a49c1e210eaa483bf69aa8d66b2ff4855.jpg
[Hide] (117.1KB, 794x1118) Reverse
4e12bbe959579f860573070461fb97a6b2dd4b49ee47da87aeb1ea71d0533a6b.jpg
[Hide] (50.4KB, 520x879) Reverse
>>9687
Feminists are the barking dogs used for this. As per their usual contradictory stance, they're first and foremost the beachhead of anything anti-male and anti-family and these screaming incestuous harpies are used to silence men and bury them under mountains of guilt for even daring objectifying women.
The rise of a prude society could be round the corner and the convenient shoving of eroticism into a category of pornography would certainly help there. After all, on top of being accused of defending man spreading and the male gaze, if you were to defend that thing they decided to call "soft pornography" we'd be pornography apologists, or the other choice we'd have would be to adopt a wholesale rejection of nudity. A total false dilemma. That's another angle to the attack on beauty we already see now in movies, games and shows with the use of ugly females with potato heads who are missing some genes. They neuter lust, they reroute our carnal desires through pornography, and they forbid us from enjoying the spectacle of desirable feminine bodies or simply adoring the sight of the nakedmost sacred motherhood. 
>>9688
>passive aggressive silliness
Why are you so easily triggered? Is the idealization of the White woman's beauty ((( rubbing ))) you the wrong way?
>>9689
>But yeah porn is for faggots and so is "eroticism." Muslims are right to ban most displays of female nudity, though I'm not saying we should burn all these old paintings like ISIS would do
The state of this board, now invaded by would be low IQ sandwiggas.

>36th Precept
>Sexual pornography degrades the Nature of all who are involved. A beautiful nude woman is art; a camera between her knees to explore her private parts is pornography.
'“Because The Beauty Of The White Aryan Woman Must Not Perish From The Earth”'
Looking back throughout the years I can't help but make the sad observation that there's way too many self-avowed free-thinking right-wingers* who hold an embarrassingly unthinking and counterproductively superstitious attitude on the topic of pornography. Yes, we can all agree it's repulsive and obscene on a conceptual level. Yes, it's a societal evil. Yes, it has proven deleterious effects on the human psyche down to the physiological level when consumed continuously in the long term. Yes, it's abhorrent for children to be exposed of it, due to the negative effects it will have in their development. Those are objective facts, none of them are in doubt.

Tragically however, it is often the case that opposition to pornography is borne of knee-jerk reactions, of repeated soundbytes and slogans rather than a proper understanding of its causes and consequences. All too often in so-called right-wing circles, even forward-thinking fascist spaces, people treat pornography as a sort of boogeyman, a spooky mind virus that will instantly corrupt your mind like it's possessed by denizens from Dante's Inferno. It's treated as a disease itself, when in reality it's mostly a vector, and in many ways it'd be more accurate to say it's a symptom of societal decay.

I think this knee-jerk opposition to anything with the slightest hint of eroticism stems from that place of superstition. See, in a healthy society there would be no need to have a hypothetical culture police prosecute pimps and pornographers, let alone have a dedicated anti-porn task force. In a healthy society boys and girls would simply approach each other, play at romance, fall in love, have sex, the whole nines. Pornography and prostitution wouldn't disappear (there'll always be a niche for it, given the nature of human vice) but they'd be relegated to the fringes of society, something shameful to do away from prying eyes, for which legal punishment would be an afterthought because the real punishment would be the shame of being caught in the act. It's precisely because we live in a society that has bastardized and commodified every minute aspect of human interaction down to sexual intimacy that pornography, parasociality and other similar ills flourish. It's because we live in a crapulent social order with no real morals or values besides endless solipsistic self-indulgement that sexual degeneracy is as rampant as it is. Just as the jews can only thrive in the swamps of our sins, degeneracy can only exist in a rotten, desensualized, commodified, consumerist dystopia like ours.

Bottom line: don't make a mountain of a molehill, focus on the real enemy. Shoot porn studio tycoons, behead pimps, bomb Mindgeek offices. Don't waste your time doodling bras over nude paintings and putting blankets on topless statues.

*I despise the false left-right dichotomy, but I'll use it here for simplicity's sake.
Replies: >>9699
>>9697
>It's treated as a disease itself, when in reality it's mostly a vector, and in many ways it'd be more accurate to say it's a symptom of societal decay.
This decay is nothing natural, it's engineered. Pornography is both disease and vector for further destruction. It's gangrene and calls for more of it.
Replies: >>9704
Spoiler File
(170.7KB, 800x1059) Reverse
Softcore pornography.
>>9699
Please try reading a post before you reply to it.
Replies: >>9705
6c9b39b5408700e8d340b081783d0c334ebb47a1001752ef7130100a477f08cc.png
[Hide] (95KB, 391x462) Reverse
>>9704
Now you're bleeding from the slit because I didn't quote your entire lecture and merely mildly disagreed with a single line of yours?
Peak fragility right there.
IMG_0315.jpeg
[Hide] (74.9KB, 327x400) Reverse
>>9687
As always, Great wisdom from the Dr himself.
From “Morality over Moralism “ - Dr. Goebbels
“An example. In a major central German city an advertising poster for a soap company showed a fresh, attractive girl holding the soap package in her hands. A moral knight who unfortunately had the right to determine the fate of this poster forbade its distribution on the ground that it offended the moral sensibilities of the population, since the woman in the poster was holding the soap in a place “that for moral reasons cannot be described more precisely.”

What is moral about this? The person announcing the ban, who presumes that other people share his dirty fantasies, or the German people and the National Socialist movement, that are rightly upset and in opposition to such a ridiculous action?”
“ Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery.“
“ Have these moral trumpeters any idea how they slander and demoralize millions of German women with their preaching, women who bravely and honestly do their duty in life and on the job, who are good comrades to their men and sacrificing mothers for their children?”
“ We do not want to abolish pleasure, but rather to let as many as possible share in it. That is why we encourage people to attend the theater, that is why we give workers the opportunity to dress well for festive occasions. That is the reason behind Kraft durch Freude. That is why we shake off the agents of a prudish hypocrisy, why we do not allow decent, hard-working people who have every reason to need relief from their hard daily labors, who need to reaffirm life, to recover from the weariness, cares, and burdens of every day, to have their necessary pleasures ruined by the eternal chicanery of these pedants.

We need more affirmation of life and less complaining! More morality, but less moralism!“
Replies: >>9755
f52539625cded218da09cef814248c3f301db91f9d69de9b4033207295ea6e6f.gif
[Hide] (5.8MB, 500x334) Reverse
>>9753
Great quotations.
>>life’s losers, protesting life itself
>>eternal chicanery of these pedants
>>moral knight
>literally encapsulating the white knight, simp lord, intellectual weakling, virtue signaling faggot and social justice warrior cancers three generations ago
Man, they already had all them bases covered, didn't they? We're really small fry.
I can barely imagine the universal epic roastings Goebbels would drop today if he had access to social networks.
Replies: >>10105
>>9755
Does that make OnlyFans and Twitch simp farms the modern version of Berlin being turned into one giant brothel?
Replies: >>10278
>>10105
Quite yes. A century later, the whole phenomenon repeating itself has merely espoused the digital realm too. I don't think it's a stretch to say that all the porn, kinky, r34 and fap this or that websites will have to be completely purged. DeviantArt goes too. Same for X if only on the basis of being a social network anyway. They are a cancer and bring the worst out of people.
I also learned that the frogs are going in. The EU wants the Digital ID to be active starting 2026. France being the good goyland fires the first salvo. X's Musk plays the offended one.
https://notthebee.com/article/france-wants-to-require-age-verification-to-use-x-because-of-widespread-pornography-on-the-platform/
https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/new-french-rules-pornographic-content-create-safer-internet-minors
The same country that doesn't let parents educate their children anymore and having the kids being taught sexual education at the equivalent of high school or even before while trained to use machines at the age of four or five already. Oh, who would think of the children??
One way or another, that rancid system goes down and the Jews, traitors and cucks with it.
Replies: >>10290
>>10278
> I don't think it's a stretch to say that all the porn, kinky, r34 and fap this or that websites will have to be completely purged. DeviantArt goes too.
Being honest? They're small fry, bottom feeders practically. Their relevance pales before the titans of the porn and prostution business. They only thrive in a world mired in complete degeneracy. When the tide starts visibly turning, the porn artists and similar degenerates will make a hasty retreat from the clearnet and thus the public eye, returning to obscurity in the fringes of society. Or better, they'll quit with the fetish nonsense and become more productive members of society. Losing their monetary incentive to peddle filth will kill their eagerness to do so.

Will they still exist? Unfortunately, and so will their clientele. Yes, even in a judenfrei world. The good news is they'll become irrelevant. It won't even be necessary to prosecute them, as living in a world where their perversions are shamed will force them and their patrons to indulge their vices in the shadows, because the best deterrent against degeneracy isn't a No Fap Taskforce monitoring every single interaction on the net and smashing down doors but a social environment where anyone caught in posession of such filth will be shamed into submission.

In the meantime? Yes, shoot pimps, bomb Mindgeek offices, set fire to porn studios, behead porn media executives on camera ISIS-style. Kill the big fish, and the bottom feeders will scatter.
Replies: >>10306 >>10312
I'm not going to lie, if I'm forced to have to interact with 3DPD to get my rocks off, I'm probably going to get publicly executed for strangling women.
>>10290
>Being honest? They're small fry, bottom feeders practically. 
Which ones? My list of key words and a few names encompasses almost all the degenerate filth we find online on the clearnet. They're part of the problem, they produce tons of degenerate content and make it easy and tempting. They shall be purged.
>Will they still exist? Unfortunately, and so will their clientele. Yes, even in a judenfrei world. The good news is they'll become irrelevant.
You have never heard of VPNs and Tor. I think we will have a responsibility to wage a war on any country that hosts that kind of shit. Or outlaw VPNs and Tor altogether.
>the best deterrent against degeneracy isn't a No Fap Taskforce monitoring every single interaction on the net
That's what the Jews hypocritically do, creating a problem, never hitting the source, but using said problem as an excuse to violate privacy. Cue Digital IDs. I say we strike for the source and leave the population alone.
>a social environment where anyone caught in posession of such filth will be shamed into submission.
That is definitely something we will have to engineer, nurture and maintain.
>In the meantime? Yes, shoot pimps, bomb Mindgeek offices, set fire to porn studios, behead porn media executives on camera ISIS-style. Kill the big fish, and the bottom feeders will scatter.
Yes. Yes. YES!
Replies: >>10308 >>10312
>>10306
>Which ones?
The big ones, duh. Mindgeek and its ilk. The ones that are hand in hand with pimps, human traffickers and politicians. Some literally who drawing lewd pictures of cartoon characters or whatever isn't the priority because he's a speck in the greater scheme of things. Those degenerates are a symptom and we should focus our energies on attacking the source of the disease. 

>You have never heard of VPNs and Tor. I think we will have a responsibility to wage a war on any country that hosts that kind of shit. Or outlaw VPNs and Tor altogether.
Setting aside that we don't get to complain about the Jewish nanny panopticon if we are on the road to become it, why oh why would we have to waste so much time and effort on such things, let alone have a "responsibility" to do so? Besides, just because something is illegal won't stop those who are determined enough from going ahead and doing their thing anyway. It wouldn't stop us, would it? 

>I say we strike for the source and leave the population alone.
Exactly,in fact this in the end is a self-correcting problem absent of Jewish influence. Allow me to illustrate.

Imagine if you will, a guy who has a Patreon and makes money drawing I dunno, Ninja Turtles porn. Or an OnlyFans whore, if you like. Doesn't matter, the relevant thing here is that they're small-time smut peddlers. Put yourself in their shoes for a sec. One day you hear about a major porn studio being firebombed and all the survivors gunned down as they attempted to evacuate the burning building. The culprits make themselves known, they're an openly fascist group who have made warring against pornography and sexual degeneracy a top bullet point in their campaign. These guys openly exhort people to "kill your local pornographer". 

You eye these news with worry, but tell yourself it's only a handful of wackos and they're going to get arrested soon. You're safe, right? But you won't feel safe, there'll always be that nagging seed of doubt and worry in the back of your head. That seed with grow and lay roots in your mind as this group of fascists grows more powerful and goes on to commit further attacks on pimps, pornographers and their financiers. You'll feel your stomach quiver when you see these rich and influential figures gunned down, set on fire, executed without mercy. You might think, well, maybe they're only going after the big fish, I'm just a small time smut purveyor, I'm safe right? But that in itself brings further worries. If they managed to get to the top dogs of the porn world, if they managed to infiltrate their mansions and storm their studios and defeated those filth peddlers' bodyguards and security systems, then a bottom feeder such as yourself doesn't stand a chance. And really, what guarantee do you have they won't come for you one day?

The spectre of death looms large as the kill count keeps climbing. Eventually, a site dedicated to pornography might close its doors, either suddenly and without warning, or it may leave a message alluding to "the climate of violence and intolerance" or what have you. Others will close down as their financiers are dead. Another smut peddler much like yourself might quit and vanish from the public eye. Then another. Then another. Clients stop buying too, worried they might be targeted next. Dominos falling one on another. Business dries up. More and more you realize the danger you're in, and unlike the bigwig porn moguls you're some nobody making a modest amount of money each month for work that now puts you at risk of a violent death. Is it really worth it to continue doing this for such meager pay, when it puts you in the sights of a group that will behead you on camera for being a degenerate? It might even invite questions as to what you're doing with your life, and whether it is worthwhile. At this point you'll probably just quit making porn altogether and find yourself a safer, more productive and fulfilling job. I guarantee that 90% amateur pornographers and other pond scum will take this choice.

What happens if you decide to soldier on, keep making smut though? Set up a VPN, an alternate identity, get paid in bitcoin or somesuch, put as much distance between your everyday identity and your porn business as possible. Well congrats, you're part of a vanishing minority. You're plying an increasingly despised trade, one that hell, might not even be openly criminalized but that if discovered will make you a complete social pariah. Same thing goes for any prospective customer, so business is infrequent and not very lucrative. And of course, you have the constant worry those people with the armbands will one day knock on your door. Those people might even know you, know your trade, but you're such an insignificant gnat that squashing you is considered a pointless waste of their time. But you don't know this, and will live with the fear of discovery every day of your life.

And without a Jewish apparatus actively enforcing an environment of sexual debauchery, lovelessness, social atomization, loneliness and consumerist banality, without the 24/7 to foster and maintain this environment, that will be your life for the foreseeable future.
Replies: >>10312 >>10334
>>10308
>>10306
>>10290
No, these are not mainly about banning porn. The reason why the UK had implemented this, for example, is to spy on the bad goys much more easily. These digital online IDs have absolutely nothing do to with pornography. If you think it does, you are an utter moron.

The facts we all need to start facing is that it is too late for us to do anything about the Jews. They now effectively shut down discussion against them in the UK and Europe. There's not a bill being floated in congress with bipartisan support in the United States which aims to do the same thing the UK wishes to do. It's all over. I am sorry, but it is.
Replies: >>10313 >>10333
>>10312
This.
Replies: >>10319
>>10313
Stop samefagging
Replies: >>10321
>>10319
There are no samefags. Just organic anons.
Replies: >>10322
>>10321
Get new material.
>>10312
>The facts we all need to start facing is that it is too late for us to do anything about the Jews. They now effectively shut down discussion against them in the UK and Europe. There's not a bill being floated in congress with bipartisan support in the United States which aims to do the same thing the UK wishes to do. It's all over. I am sorry, but it is.
Yes and no. Politically (read democratically) it's really tight right now, but it has forced the hand of our enemy. Nevertheless the pro-white discourse is making great strides IRL and online. This is precisely why the Jews are panicking. It also antagonizes our people so much that some of them are becoming radicalized. There will always be cucks and traitors, but there certainly are Whites who are now very close to our positions. For sure they cannot espouse them fully right now and they will certainly not agree with most of what we say, but the edginess of outlawed politicial opinions mixed to memes, facts and humor still works very well. Soon enough our populations will be collectively ripe for a coup. Don't lose hope anon. The final boss is the Jew and he has a ton of weaknesses.
>>10308
>Setting aside that we don't get to complain about the Jewish nanny panopticon if we are on the road to become it,
What? Have you forgotten that Fascists aren't for the freedom of speech outside of specific conditions such in a court of justice for example? Why wouldn't we keep an eye on potential subversives and censor our enemies regardless of their race, gender, wealth or age? We shouldn't let small people defend communism, homosexuality, non-White immigration or under age sex crimes.
>why oh why would we have to waste so much time and effort on such things, let alone have a "responsibility" to do so?
I don't see this as a waste for the same reason that the Third Reich didn't see it as a waste and went after the wicked, small and the large. A political stance has to be coherent and to me that means applying the same form of repression against the smaller players as is done against the bigger ones. Eventually the smaller fry can be taken care of by the dedicated agents, boots on the street, militants and indoctrinated mob.
>Besides, just because something is illegal won't stop those who are determined enough from going ahead and doing their thing anyway. It wouldn't stop us, would it?
What point are you making? Laws influence how people think because we like order so whatever is legal is usually deemed legitimate. Likewise, the illegal material is disparaged. I don't care if there are people who are determined to loop through burners, temp keys, payment schemes and secret websites to get their shot because the point I was making was that we are looking at platforms, some of them particularly large. What is wasteful is to find excuses like you do not to strike these websites down. I don't care if Mindgeek covers 90% of the market, all the other services and platforms will be handled the same way. Same goes for the international service platforms that are not primarily dedicated to porn but nevertheless have room for people involved in such activities: either these services completely purge the filth on their side and thus input a policy that affects all their assets, or they get simply banned if they're not falling under the law we manage because they'd be operating overseas. That would be a brute force negotiation and it could cascade into simply cutting all possible ties to the countries hosting these companies.
>Imagine if you will, a guy who has a Patreon and makes money drawing I dunno, Ninja Turtles porn. Or an OnlyFans whore, if you like. Doesn't matter, the relevant thing here is that they're small-time smut peddlers.
I don't care. Whatever website that hosts that shit will get targeted and will either have to comply or being entirely blocked, with as I said just before, far ranging consequences for the relations with other nations since there would be nothing good to get from relations with such perverted countries.
>One day you hear about a major porn studio being firebombed and all the survivors gunned down as they attempted to evacuate the burning building. The culprits make themselves known, they're an openly fascist group who have made warring against pornography and sexual degeneracy a top bullet point in their campaign. These guys openly exhort people to "kill your local pornographer".
But this is likely a pre-change situation or occurring during the transition from a Judaized society to a fascist one. In the later stage, the heavy work will be handled by the state and perhaps some degree of mob justice will be let to happen to take care of point issues at a granular level. Nevertheless, the platforms that allow for these things to happen will be attacked as ferociously as needed, either by early revolutionaries or by the state.
Also, you're typing waaaaayy too much to defend the smaller solo producers of this filth. It's almost as if you had chips in that ordeal.
20da825981e3c04f7dbc91063e34335a09bf80bf3c2a61e69e95e7b7813c3b03.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 3084x2608) Reverse
For what it's worth, a survey.
60% males, largely western, US-based and white. 27 years old on average.
There's a "white people" parameter got lost in the mix (top left, around 3/4 in reported interest, close to 0 in avg. taboo rating).
Who responded is important, it's proving an audience that is not world bound but rather limited to the US.
Straight men are far more likely to report a strong interest in "white people" (slightly above 3) with a near zero taboo rating. rating slightlyh above 3), and as the color of this marker is certainly well shoved to the right, in the dark purple region, what we see is that women are not on the average less into "white people" while men are more into it, wishing more to have sex with white females. Not that this is a good thing because women are specifically targeted by miscegenation propaganda at school, in ads and in entertainment.
The ratio male:female is only 1.5+ though. The "white people" is also a square so that's a top 10% item for CIS people, supposedly meaning that straight people, and mostly men, are into white women.
There is however a taste for "asian people" that's lower in reported interest, at 2.7. I wonder if this is due to the intensive K-pop shilling mixed to a desire to find more modest and submissive females while everything is done to make our own females less and less attractive (with mixed success but man imagine if the whole culture actually bothered to nurture them into perfect women and spouses?). But it's also valued at 0.5/5 on the taboo scale so there's a beginning of rejection and guilt.
As for the "black people" they come around 2.25/4, the lower of all, it's at about 0.6 as a taboo and the marker is a disc so it's an item that is in the 80% of people whether they're faggy or not, while the two other race related markers were squares (heterosexual preference). Admitedly I have an issue clearly understanding the keys for the geometric shapes but at least I understand that the more an item is typically and strongly desired by heterosexuals, the more it has a chance to show up as a square. A triangle is really a fag's obsession.
In the case of the race, white and asian are clearly a highly valued item for heterosexual people if I get this, but niggers are more for the normies who on this sexual orientation spectrum seem to sit between the straight and homo ends.

Also, women are the most to report wanting to be submissive, on the extreme left side of the sex spectrum (the study says gender because globohomo buzzwords and social pseudo-science).
All the triangles tend to linger in the cesspoll of 3+ taboo ratings, and usually quite below 1 in terms of reported interest.
I found a "zombies" parameter and it's not that far from the "furries" one. Geez.
And just to bump the pedoY/N hot take, can you find where the "teen" parameter is, what its color and shape are?
Replies: >>11207
>>11196
>viral tiktoks
>cis, not-cis
This is retarded.
[New Reply]
31 replies | 18 files | 22 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3