>>1039
You don’t have to be smart to know that the classic portrayal of Yaoi/Yuri is completely different from the modern westernized portrayal of it in media. You can’t call Berserk gay and woke because Griffith was fucked in the ass. There’s nuance to be taken into consideration. The existence of Astolfo from fate and other traps, wasn’t to normalize homosexuality, like in the case of Witch from Mercury, where the show ends with rings in their fingers, which is a subtle political message about the ongoing same-sex marriage debate in Asia.
Actually why should I mention other works when I have JoJo itself?
In part 7 Lucy steel was molested by another woman, so why is it different to JoJolands now? Because it was completely sexual in nature, there wasn’t an underlying motive behind it, like supporting the modern LGBT movement. The woman who molested her was a married woman, talking about how she loved having sex with her husband, which was intentional to not make it a homoerotic scene, but typical fan service, because most men like some lesbian action, but not the LGBT one. Meanwhile in JoJolands, the lesbian in question is black, who talked about how she hates men, then sent a text to her white girlfriend that she loves her sooooo much. Why was thar situation handled in a completely different manner?
>>1040
JoJo was always bizarre and weird in a “gay” way but never actually homosexual. The only instance of homosexuality in the series was a one panel, literally one of two guys hugging each other, and it was never confirmed if they were a couple actually. So I ask, part 5 was in 1995, why did it take Araki literally 30 years to depict homosexuality again, if it was always gay and one of his interests? Strange.
And this part in particular is odd, it’s set in America, the main Jobro is a tranny, riddled with Breaking Bad references and other tv shows, and now you have an interracial lesbian couple.